Dusk's ambition is not to overthrow traditional finance (such as giants like Euroclear or DTCC), but to provide an interoperable upgrade pathway.
Just look at its collaboration with the Dutch NPEX exchange — this model is very representative. In simple terms, Dusk handles the underlying settlement and privacy protection, while NPEX provides legal identity, regulatory licenses, and an existing customer base. Both parties play to their strengths.
This hybrid solution of "off-chain compliance interface + on-chain privacy settlement" is particularly clever. Traditional financial institutions can adopt this approach without having to overthrow their existing business systems, allowing them to gradually introduce blockchain technology to improve efficiency, increase transparency, and even develop new products. The pressure is low, and the risks are manageable.
In other words, Dusk's value does not come from destruction and rebuilding, but from empowering and upgrading existing systems. This evolutionary development path is more certain than radical disruption and easier to sustain in the long run.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSauceMaster
· 5h ago
This is the reality. Don't keep talking about disrupting finance; collaborating with traditional players is the right way.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 5h ago
This logic is interesting, but it still feels like the old approach—traditional finance wants the technological benefits of blockchain but doesn't want to relinquish control. Dusk's collaboration plan seems like a win-win on the surface, but in reality, it's still being led by traditional institutions.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 5h ago
Oh, this hybrid plan is indeed quite interesting, much more reliable than those projects that keep shouting about revolution all day long.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 5h ago
Oh, now that's right. Innovation doesn't have to mean starting from scratch; leveraging existing strengths is the mark of a master.
Dusk's ambition is not to overthrow traditional finance (such as giants like Euroclear or DTCC), but to provide an interoperable upgrade pathway.
Just look at its collaboration with the Dutch NPEX exchange — this model is very representative. In simple terms, Dusk handles the underlying settlement and privacy protection, while NPEX provides legal identity, regulatory licenses, and an existing customer base. Both parties play to their strengths.
This hybrid solution of "off-chain compliance interface + on-chain privacy settlement" is particularly clever. Traditional financial institutions can adopt this approach without having to overthrow their existing business systems, allowing them to gradually introduce blockchain technology to improve efficiency, increase transparency, and even develop new products. The pressure is low, and the risks are manageable.
In other words, Dusk's value does not come from destruction and rebuilding, but from empowering and upgrading existing systems. This evolutionary development path is more certain than radical disruption and easier to sustain in the long run.