Recently, I've been looking into projects in the privacy track, and one idea is becoming clearer—truly reliable financial privacy isn't about complete anonymity, but about protecting transaction details while remaining auditable.
Dusk's Hedger solution exemplifies this approach. By combining zero-knowledge proofs with homomorphic encryption, transaction information is handled as a black box externally, but compliance departments can still access the data they need for audits. This may not sound like the extreme privacy advocate's ideal, but when integrating with real-world financial systems? That's a whole different story.
If institutions adopt a system, the prerequisite is that it can be audited and traced. This has been a gap in the past, and Hedger fills that gap. From an engineering design perspective, this is responsible for long-term use, rather than blindly stacking features.
So, looking at the DUSK project, I see it as laying the foundational layer for the next wave of compliant DeFi and RWA, not just a short-term hype concept. The true value lies in the feasibility of the underlying technology, and this direction is correct.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
mev_me_maybe
· 11h ago
I agree with this idea... Privacy and compliance are not inherently contradictory; rather, they are complementary.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 11h ago
This is the practical approach, much better than those who boast about being completely anonymous.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 11h ago
To be honest, I never really understood how privacy and compliance could be satisfied at the same time before. Now, with your explanation... I have a bit of an epiphany.
The zero-knowledge proof approach is indeed brilliant; it doesn't reveal details yet allows regulators to verify, which is a practical solution.
However, if DUSK can truly pave the way for RWA, it still depends on whether institutions are on board. No matter how advanced the technology is, if the market doesn't accept it, it's all for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptain
· 12h ago
Ha, finally someone said it. Privacy isn't hide-and-seek; it must withstand scrutiny, otherwise institutions wouldn't dare to touch it.
Recently, I've been looking into projects in the privacy track, and one idea is becoming clearer—truly reliable financial privacy isn't about complete anonymity, but about protecting transaction details while remaining auditable.
Dusk's Hedger solution exemplifies this approach. By combining zero-knowledge proofs with homomorphic encryption, transaction information is handled as a black box externally, but compliance departments can still access the data they need for audits. This may not sound like the extreme privacy advocate's ideal, but when integrating with real-world financial systems? That's a whole different story.
If institutions adopt a system, the prerequisite is that it can be audited and traced. This has been a gap in the past, and Hedger fills that gap. From an engineering design perspective, this is responsible for long-term use, rather than blindly stacking features.
So, looking at the DUSK project, I see it as laying the foundational layer for the next wave of compliant DeFi and RWA, not just a short-term hype concept. The true value lies in the feasibility of the underlying technology, and this direction is correct.