When it comes to blockchain scalability issues, this topic always revolves around the dilemma of the "Impossible Triangle." By 2026, in this cycle, we see Rollups becoming quite mature, and sharding technology also evolving. But do you know? In scenarios requiring extreme throughput, this old technology Plasma still has some tricks up its sleeve.
**Why is Plasma still worth paying attention to?**
Simply put, Plasma is not just about speed; it also aims for "wide" coverage. Its approach is somewhat similar to MapReduce in computers—building a layered sidechain tree structure, offloading complex computations and data storage to off-chain processing, and only periodically submitting the final state commitments to the main chain. What are the benefits of this? Transaction processing capacity can increase exponentially, theoretically reaching hundreds of thousands of transactions per second.
**Fraud proof mechanism is the key**
The fraud proof system introduced by Plasma is even more critical. If any node dares to submit an invalid block, any observer can submit proof to the main chain to report it. This design guarantees the system's security while maintaining scalability. That’s also why, in certain application scenarios, Plasma still demonstrates an irreplaceable technical resilience. The XPL project is a practical implementation based on this architecture.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ClassicDumpster
· 10h ago
The case is solved. Plasma is that guy everyone said was dead but came back to life. Truly awesome.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 11h ago
But how many scenarios can truly utilize Plasma? It still feels like theory outweighs practice.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 11h ago
Plasma, that old thing, really hasn't died yet. Every time people say it's viable, but I haven't seen it truly scale up.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 11h ago
Damn, can Plasma make a comeback? I thought this guy was already done for.
Old technology is old technology, but this fraud-proof system is indeed a bit of a dead end.
Hundreds of thousands of TPS sounds impressive, but the real performance is another story.
Mapping to MapReduce is really a good analogy, but who will guarantee the trustworthiness of off-chain data?
I need to check out the XPL project, it seems pretty interesting.
Rollups have been popular for so long, it's quite surprising to see Plasma being brought up again suddenly.
The impossible triangle is always a false proposition; it all depends on how you trade off.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulled
· 11h ago
The Plasma old-school solution actually has some merit; I didn't expect it to make a comeback.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTherapist
· 11h ago
ngl plasma's fraud proof system is lowkey genius for trauma-coded traders who've been through rollup rug seasons... have you considered your resistance to older tech might be portfolio anxiety manifesting? 🧠
Reply0
ContractBugHunter
· 11h ago
Still hyping Plasma, it's already 2026 and you're still fixated on this thing.
Honestly, Rollups are working well, why bother messing with this old relic?
Just for the fraud proof mechanism alone, I can sleep soundly while waiting for validation.
Is XPL reliable? Has anyone actually used it?
Plasma sounds great in theory, but in practice, uh...
Hundreds of thousands of transactions per second, just listen and don't take it seriously.
Rollups are still more hassle-free; this thing has too many pitfalls.
Can MapReduce be compared to blockchain? I don't quite buy that logic.
Does the state commitment bundling really guarantee security?
It's hyped so much, but I haven't seen anyone using it on mainnet.
When it comes to blockchain scalability issues, this topic always revolves around the dilemma of the "Impossible Triangle." By 2026, in this cycle, we see Rollups becoming quite mature, and sharding technology also evolving. But do you know? In scenarios requiring extreme throughput, this old technology Plasma still has some tricks up its sleeve.
**Why is Plasma still worth paying attention to?**
Simply put, Plasma is not just about speed; it also aims for "wide" coverage. Its approach is somewhat similar to MapReduce in computers—building a layered sidechain tree structure, offloading complex computations and data storage to off-chain processing, and only periodically submitting the final state commitments to the main chain. What are the benefits of this? Transaction processing capacity can increase exponentially, theoretically reaching hundreds of thousands of transactions per second.
**Fraud proof mechanism is the key**
The fraud proof system introduced by Plasma is even more critical. If any node dares to submit an invalid block, any observer can submit proof to the main chain to report it. This design guarantees the system's security while maintaining scalability. That’s also why, in certain application scenarios, Plasma still demonstrates an irreplaceable technical resilience. The XPL project is a practical implementation based on this architecture.