2026-01-20 01:28:54

I want to ask, you need 300,000 followers to get verified through the official account. What's the logic behind this? An official account of a major exchange was just verified last quarter, and in less than half a month, more than half of the followers disappeared?

Even more outrageous is the award list that was published—I didn't see any related articles yesterday, but today, upon refreshing, it just appeared out of nowhere. Isn't this tactic a bit too obvious?

Can the transparency of data for popular tokens like $BNB and $ETH and their related activities be improved a bit?

BNB-1,44%

ETH-3,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlwaysQuestioning

· 7h ago

Wow, this fan loss is just too outrageous, losing half in half a month? The certification rules are like personal relationships, it feels like there's no clear standard. And those rankings that suddenly appear out of nowhere, honestly a bit off-putting... Data transparency really needs to be improved, or who will trust it?

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 7h ago

Wow, the drop in follower count is so bizarre... Half of them disappeared in just half a month? The leaderboard just suddenly appeared out of nowhere, this really can't hold up haha Poor data transparency is a common problem, anyway all major exchanges are like this Speaking for myself, these official accounts play tricks that are even more volatile than the coin price fluctuations

View OriginalReply0

NervousFingers

· 7h ago

These data fluctuations are quite intense. Losing half of the followers in half a month? Can that be explained?

View OriginalReply0