The NYSE stock tokenization plan has attracted attention, but what is the progress? Currently, it is still awaiting approval, and no one can say exactly when it will be released. However, the interesting part of this plan is not just the 24-hour trading.
From an operational perspective, this platform adopts a hybrid approach—combining centralized management with decentralized mechanisms. This compromise is more likely to gain regulatory approval.
On the asset side, there are two paths: one is to tokenize existing "established" US stocks, directly bringing traditional stocks onto the blockchain; the other is to create entirely new tokenized stock varieties. The former revitalizes existing assets, while the latter explores new growth, making the dual approach quite clear.
In essence, this is not just a change in trading hours but an exploration of traditional financial liquidity and trading models. Whether it can ultimately be implemented and how to balance centralized governance with decentralized features will depend on subsequent policy developments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkThisDAO
· 8h ago
The NYSE's recent moves, to put it nicely, are innovative; to be blunt, they might be playing both sides. Centralization and decentralization are both necessary. Who will take responsibility if something goes wrong?
Approval is still a distant prospect, we're just waiting.
But this approach does have some merit—walking on two legs to activate existing assets and develop new ones. It sounds like a compromise between traditional finance and the blockchain world.
24-hour trading sounds great, but will regulators really loosen up?
Ultimately, it still depends on policy decisions. Who dares to gamble on policy directions these days?
If this hybrid plan really materializes, it could have a significant impact on existing on-chain trading platforms.
Tokenized US stocks? It feels like a rebranded old story. It's still unclear where the real growth will come from.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 8h ago
Another bunch of "hybrid方案" statements. Basically, it's still dancing between regulation and innovation.
A compromise方案 sounds good, but will it actually be implemented?
24-hour trading sounds appealing, but can the liquidity keep up? That's the real key.
Walking on two legs? I just want to know whether it will end up running or falling.
At the approval stage, these方案 are all prone to change.
Once policies change, the entire logic could collapse.
It still feels like the traditional financial mindset, just wrapped in a layer of blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 8h ago
Honestly, this hybrid plan is just trying to have it both ways... Waiting for approval seems like a distant hope.
Let's wait until the day it officially launches. Right now, it's all just talk.
Centralization + decentralization sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just a product of compromise.
Revitalizing existing assets and expanding new ones sounds great, but the key question is whether it can pass regulatory scrutiny.
Traditional finance just doesn't want to be disrupted. Most likely, this set of solutions will end up being a cut-down version.
I'm only concerned about when we can truly have 24-hour trading; everything else is just stories.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAll
· 8h ago
Waiting for approval again, I’m familiar with this routine; regulators drag their feet year after year.
The hybrid approach sounds like trying to please both sides; only when it can truly be implemented does it count.
24-hour trading sounds great, but the key is whether the liquidity can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctor
· 8h ago
Waiting for approval, feels like it's never-ending.
The hybrid approach sounds a bit safer, but can it truly achieve decentralization?
Walking on two legs sounds good, but the key is for policies to allow it.
24-hour trading sounds great, but is there enough liquidity?
If this can really be implemented, traditional finance will be panicked.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 8h ago
honestly the hybrid model thing is just lipstick on a pig... if you actually analyze the data, tokenizing existing equities creates unnecessary settlement overhead. demonstrably inefficient compared to native blockchain equities tbh
The NYSE stock tokenization plan has attracted attention, but what is the progress? Currently, it is still awaiting approval, and no one can say exactly when it will be released. However, the interesting part of this plan is not just the 24-hour trading.
From an operational perspective, this platform adopts a hybrid approach—combining centralized management with decentralized mechanisms. This compromise is more likely to gain regulatory approval.
On the asset side, there are two paths: one is to tokenize existing "established" US stocks, directly bringing traditional stocks onto the blockchain; the other is to create entirely new tokenized stock varieties. The former revitalizes existing assets, while the latter explores new growth, making the dual approach quite clear.
In essence, this is not just a change in trading hours but an exploration of traditional financial liquidity and trading models. Whether it can ultimately be implemented and how to balance centralized governance with decentralized features will depend on subsequent policy developments.