The institutional crypto sector is undergoing a significant transformation as major firms actively pursue multiple licensing pathways—from broker-dealer permits to RIA registrations and full banking charters. This multi-pronged approach signals serious institutional intent to operate within established regulatory frameworks.
Meanwhile, traditional finance players are making calculated moves into blockchain infrastructure. They're architecting systems that settle transactions onchain while maintaining their matching engines offline, essentially cherry-picking blockchain's settlement efficiency without fully surrendering control of order flow and execution.
What's remarkable is the convergence accelerating across both directions. Crypto-native companies are climbing the regulatory ladder to access traditional financial rails, while TradFi institutions are strategically adopting blockchain settlement layers. This middle ground represents the emerging infrastructure of hybrid finance—where institutional-grade compliance meets onchain transparency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
staking_gramps
· 21h ago
In simple terms, institutions are playing both sides—crypto teams are obtaining licenses, traditional finance is bottoming out on on-chain settlements—all trying to have their cake and eat it too.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 21h ago
Big institutions are all playing double standards one after another. They see the settlement efficiency of crypto but are reluctant to relinquish control, which is truly a bit greedy.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 21h ago
Big institutions are really clever with this move. On one hand, they want licenses, and on the other, they secretly do on-chain settlements—typical of wanting both the fish and the bear's paw.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 21h ago
Basically, everyone is getting closer to each other. Crypto wants to be compliant, and traditional finance wants on-chain efficiency. Doesn't it feel a bit hypocritical?
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeError
· 21h ago
To be honest, I understand the logic of this hybrid finance, but I feel like the big institutions are still hedging their bets on both sides.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 21h ago
Basically, everyone wants both the fish and the bear's paw. The old folks in TradFi still need to obediently go on-chain.
The institutional crypto sector is undergoing a significant transformation as major firms actively pursue multiple licensing pathways—from broker-dealer permits to RIA registrations and full banking charters. This multi-pronged approach signals serious institutional intent to operate within established regulatory frameworks.
Meanwhile, traditional finance players are making calculated moves into blockchain infrastructure. They're architecting systems that settle transactions onchain while maintaining their matching engines offline, essentially cherry-picking blockchain's settlement efficiency without fully surrendering control of order flow and execution.
What's remarkable is the convergence accelerating across both directions. Crypto-native companies are climbing the regulatory ladder to access traditional financial rails, while TradFi institutions are strategically adopting blockchain settlement layers. This middle ground represents the emerging infrastructure of hybrid finance—where institutional-grade compliance meets onchain transparency.