Recently revisited the project setup of Dusk Foundation, and the more I research, the more interesting it becomes. To be honest, most Layer1s now are competing over who has higher TPS and better performance metrics, but Dusk has had a different approach from the start — they focus directly on financial applications, especially RWA and compliance privacy.
The design logic of DuskEVM is quite clever. On one hand, it maintains compatibility with the existing EVM ecosystem through modularization, so as not to fragment developer resources; on the other hand, it supports auditable private transactions at the foundational level, which is technically quite challenging. In other words, most public chains simply can't achieve both openness and auditable privacy levels.
From an ecosystem development perspective, the $DUSK token carries significant weight. It's not just about price expectations; it's more about verifying whether a compliant financial network can truly get off the ground. Once more regulated assets start to go on-chain, infrastructure projects like Dusk might be reevaluated by the market at a certain point.
So right now, I am continuously monitoring Dusk's technological iterations; short-term price fluctuations are becoming less important.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 13h ago
Dusk's perspective is indeed different; the path of financial compliance is much more solid than just competing on TPS.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 01-20 01:54
It really sounds promising, but the RWA sector still feels a bit vague. It seems like there's a lot of hype, but the actual on-chain assets are still scarce.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-20 01:51
The path of compliance and privacy is indeed much more stable than rushing for TPS; it has to be taken step by step.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-20 01:51
Wow, someone finally understands the core logic of Dusk, it's not just about stacking TPS.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyr
· 01-20 01:51
The path of compliance and privacy is indeed tough; most public chains don't even dare to think about it.
RWA is the real test once it comes online; right now, we're still in the PPT stage.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 01-20 01:50
The path of compliance and privacy indeed can't compete with TPS monsters, but the long-term logic remains here.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-20 01:49
From the perspective of compliance and privacy, it's true that others haven't thought of it, and the key is that it was actually implemented.
Recently revisited the project setup of Dusk Foundation, and the more I research, the more interesting it becomes. To be honest, most Layer1s now are competing over who has higher TPS and better performance metrics, but Dusk has had a different approach from the start — they focus directly on financial applications, especially RWA and compliance privacy.
The design logic of DuskEVM is quite clever. On one hand, it maintains compatibility with the existing EVM ecosystem through modularization, so as not to fragment developer resources; on the other hand, it supports auditable private transactions at the foundational level, which is technically quite challenging. In other words, most public chains simply can't achieve both openness and auditable privacy levels.
From an ecosystem development perspective, the $DUSK token carries significant weight. It's not just about price expectations; it's more about verifying whether a compliant financial network can truly get off the ground. Once more regulated assets start to go on-chain, infrastructure projects like Dusk might be reevaluated by the market at a certain point.
So right now, I am continuously monitoring Dusk's technological iterations; short-term price fluctuations are becoming less important.