The $TROVE project raised $10M but trades below $1M—classic early warning sign. What's troubling here isn't just the valuation gap; it's how selective the deal distribution was. When token allocations favor insiders while retail gets sidelined, you're watching the blueprint for a project that won't hold value. The market's already pricing in the risk. Early rounds with massive valuations followed by weak liquidity usually end one way. This pattern shows why fundamental fairness in token economics matters more than hype.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 8h ago
10M was raised in vain, I've seen this trick too many times
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 8h ago
It's the same old insider trick of cutting leeks again. Early-stage funding valuations are inflated to the sky, and retail investors start to panic sell.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 8h ago
Insider manipulation of pumping and dumping, I can see through this routine with my eyes closed... Another classic case of VC harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 8h ago
ngl the $10M → sub $1M pipeline is basically a textbook liquidity death spiral. insider bagholding patterns always follow the same entropy trajectory... watched this exact math play out three times last cycle lmao
Reply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 8h ago
Insiders are front-running, retail investors are getting cut. I've seen this trick too many times. What does this wave of TROVE count as?
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, insiders are bleeding the system dry, retail investors are getting chopped like leeks.
The $TROVE project raised $10M but trades below $1M—classic early warning sign. What's troubling here isn't just the valuation gap; it's how selective the deal distribution was. When token allocations favor insiders while retail gets sidelined, you're watching the blueprint for a project that won't hold value. The market's already pricing in the risk. Early rounds with massive valuations followed by weak liquidity usually end one way. This pattern shows why fundamental fairness in token economics matters more than hype.