The Sui ecosystem is accelerating its expansion, and the gap in decentralized storage infrastructure is becoming increasingly evident. Why can Walrus stand out?
Technically, this project is closely aligned with Sui's architecture. It uses erasure coding redundancy mechanisms to ensure data availability while reducing storage costs. RWA, DeFi, Web3 content storage—these scenarios all offer verifiable, programmable solutions. This is not just hype—it's a truly on-chain data storage infrastructure.
The logic behind the token $WAL is also clear. It supports practical value through three dimensions: payment settlement, staking validation, and governance participation. If applications on the Sui ecosystem increase and storage demand rises accordingly, the supply and demand balance of $WAL will face upward pressure. This is a typical path of value accumulation for infrastructure.
But honestly, the decentralized storage track is very competitive right now. Who can survive? It depends on two things: first, whether real adoption can pick up, and second, whether cross-chain compatibility is strong. Short-term price fluctuations are inevitable, but evaluating such projects shouldn't focus only on K-line; technical implementation depth and ecosystem integration strength are the long-term determinants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetective
· 5h ago
Whether the erasure coding system can truly be implemented is the key. There are too many projects being hyped up now.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 5h ago
Actual adoption rate is the key. There are too many projects being hyped now; how many are truly implementable?
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 5h ago
watching walrus like it's a chart pattern waiting to break... the erasure coding mechanics are clean but adoption velocity is still in accumulation phase. real talk though - most storage plays die because they're solving for infrastructure nobody's desperate enough to pay for yet. $WAL's tokenomics read textbook but that doesn't move transaction velocity... does it?
Reply0
DYORMaster
· 5h ago
Sounds good, but who isn't hyping it up like this now? The real question is whether it can actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDroplets
· 5h ago
Are erasure codes reliable? I feel like it sounds a bit mysterious.
The Sui ecosystem is accelerating its expansion, and the gap in decentralized storage infrastructure is becoming increasingly evident. Why can Walrus stand out?
Technically, this project is closely aligned with Sui's architecture. It uses erasure coding redundancy mechanisms to ensure data availability while reducing storage costs. RWA, DeFi, Web3 content storage—these scenarios all offer verifiable, programmable solutions. This is not just hype—it's a truly on-chain data storage infrastructure.
The logic behind the token $WAL is also clear. It supports practical value through three dimensions: payment settlement, staking validation, and governance participation. If applications on the Sui ecosystem increase and storage demand rises accordingly, the supply and demand balance of $WAL will face upward pressure. This is a typical path of value accumulation for infrastructure.
But honestly, the decentralized storage track is very competitive right now. Who can survive? It depends on two things: first, whether real adoption can pick up, and second, whether cross-chain compatibility is strong. Short-term price fluctuations are inevitable, but evaluating such projects shouldn't focus only on K-line; technical implementation depth and ecosystem integration strength are the long-term determinants.