The blockchain industry has an old problem: privacy protection and regulatory compliance are often seen as opposites. But some projects are breaking this perception.
Dusk Network is trying an interesting approach—it’s not a traditional public ledger, but a Layer-1 infrastructure built for institutions and developers. What’s the core selling point? It can protect sensitive data privacy while meeting regulatory requirements. It sounds a bit contradictory, but there are indeed technical solutions.
The underlying method is Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP). Simply put: you can prove that a transaction is legitimate without revealing all the details. For example, a transfer can hide the amount and recipient, but when regulators need it, authorized parties can provide a complete audit proof. This is very attractive to financial institutions—they don’t have to worry about competitors seeing business details, and they can still comply with KYC/AML regulations.
The project also incorporates support for Real World Assets (RWA), aiming to enable traditional finance issuance, trading, and clearing processes directly on-chain without modifying existing regulatory frameworks. It uses a modular architecture, which reportedly reduces execution costs while increasing transparency.
The logic behind this design is: privacy protection is not about evading regulation, but about making compliance easier. Financial institutions don’t want to casually expose internal data, but if they can obtain compliance proofs under confidentiality, they are more willing to go on-chain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropAnxiety
· 8h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; privacy and compliance are no longer mutually exclusive.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 8h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed imaginative, but the key is whether they can be practically implemented.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 8h ago
Wow, zero-knowledge proofs are really a way of solving problems; privacy and compliance don't necessarily have to be at odds.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholar
· 8h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed a clever logic, but the real challenge is whether institutions will buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 8h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive; regulators and privacy advocates, once at odds, can finally coexist.
The blockchain industry has an old problem: privacy protection and regulatory compliance are often seen as opposites. But some projects are breaking this perception.
Dusk Network is trying an interesting approach—it’s not a traditional public ledger, but a Layer-1 infrastructure built for institutions and developers. What’s the core selling point? It can protect sensitive data privacy while meeting regulatory requirements. It sounds a bit contradictory, but there are indeed technical solutions.
The underlying method is Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP). Simply put: you can prove that a transaction is legitimate without revealing all the details. For example, a transfer can hide the amount and recipient, but when regulators need it, authorized parties can provide a complete audit proof. This is very attractive to financial institutions—they don’t have to worry about competitors seeing business details, and they can still comply with KYC/AML regulations.
The project also incorporates support for Real World Assets (RWA), aiming to enable traditional finance issuance, trading, and clearing processes directly on-chain without modifying existing regulatory frameworks. It uses a modular architecture, which reportedly reduces execution costs while increasing transparency.
The logic behind this design is: privacy protection is not about evading regulation, but about making compliance easier. Financial institutions don’t want to casually expose internal data, but if they can obtain compliance proofs under confidentiality, they are more willing to go on-chain.