2026-01-20 01:20:28

#数字资产市场动态 Many people are still debating whether UNI should be issued additionally, but those who truly understand on-chain data have already realized it. 🔍

To be clear: those 20 million UNI are not printed out of thin air. This is a Growth Budget allocated from the treasury to support ecosystem projects, which is entirely different in nature. The proposal details are fully transparent on-chain, managed jointly by the DAO and project teams, with no behind-the-scenes manipulation. Moreover, UNI's annual issuance mechanism was halted last year; otherwise, the total supply would have already exceeded 1.02 billion.

The real core of this proposal is actually burning. How to turn UNI into a deflationary asset? It’s by using a small portion of the treasury to fund the ecosystem’s long-term growth—that’s the smart accounting approach. Don’t confuse "funding" with "issuance"; understanding the mechanism is key to holding a firm position in the market. 💎

$UNI

UNI-0,62%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepyValidator

· 5h ago

Basically, it's the gap between understanding on-chain data and not understanding. Retail investors are still struggling with issuance, while experts have already seen through it.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 5h ago

On-chain transparency is better than just arguing. These people are still debating about issuance increases; they haven't really understood the proposal.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 5h ago

Treasury funding is not the same as issuance; these two really shouldn't be confused. Understanding this is the key to stabilizing your UNI holdings.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 5h ago

Oh wow, you're still worried about issuance? You probably haven't checked the on-chain data, you're a bit outdated.

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 6h ago

Haha, another one confusing allocation and issuance. Stop shouting blindly. --- Understanding the destruction mechanism is what truly earns chips; everyone else is just a leek. --- On-chain data is right here, yet some still insist on making up stories. --- DAO governance is straightforward; it all depends on execution capability. Anyone can shout slogans. --- Deflation expectations are rising, which feels much better than just printing money. --- The key is whether the destruction volume is aggressive enough; otherwise, it's all in vain. --- Supporting the ecosystem is fine, but can we really trust this transparency? --- Smart people have already gotten on board long ago; it's just a bit late to react now. --- Don't just look at the allocation numbers; the focus should be on how the money is spent.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 6h ago

Got it. Basically, it's not an issuance of new tokens, just funding. A bunch of people are still worrying unnecessarily.

View OriginalReply0