#比特币价格波动 This analysis is quite interesting. Bloomberg strategist's mention of "adjustment risk after excessive rise" actually reflects a very deep market principle—any asset that rises rapidly will self-correct.

But what I want to say here is that the logic faced by Bitcoin and traditional assets is actually completely different. Gold and stocks are based on a passive supply and demand balance issue, whereas behind Bitcoin's volatility lies something even more powerful: its scarcity is hardcoded, and no one can increase supply to push prices down.

The decline of Bitcoin in 2025 is more the result of market sentiment and macro factors, rather than a deterioration of fundamentals. Imagine that as more and more institutions allocate Bitcoin as part of their portfolios, this volatility will gradually subside. This is precisely the process of decentralized assets maturing.

Short-term price fluctuations are normal, but in the long run, Bitcoin represents a completely new way of storing value—independent of any central institution and resistant to over-issuance, something gold and stocks cannot achieve. The decline actually presents an opportunity for more people to enter.

True Web3 builders never care about short-term volatility. What we care about is the overall direction of this decentralized revolution.