#现实世界资产RWA代币化 Seeing the 17 trend predictions from a16z, I have to be honest — RWA tokenization excites me but also makes me cautious.
What excites me is that this truly represents a shift in direction. Moving from purely transaction-driven to infrastructure-driven indicates that the market is finally becoming more rational. Stablecoins are becoming the key for fiat on/off ramps, which means on-chain assets now have a real value anchor, no longer just castles in the air.
But there are more reasons to be wary. I've been in this space for many years and have seen too many "innovative concepts" turn into tools for harvesting retail investors. RWA sounds great — bringing real-world assets on-chain, making wealth management accessible to everyone — but where are the real issues? The problem lies in the emergence of many fake RWA projects during this process.
What does "native crypto approach" mean? Honestly, if you see a project claiming to tokenize real estate, bonds, or art, don’t rush in just yet. Ask yourself: Does the underlying asset truly exist? Is there a solid legal framework to protect it? Has the issuer been audited? Too many projects use the RWA label to issue tokens, but in reality, they are no different from traditional scams.
If 2026 truly becomes the year of RWA explosion, the risks will also grow exponentially. I recommend everyone start learning how to distinguish genuine from fake RWA now — look at the team background, legal compliance, whether there are real assets backing it — rather than just focusing on concepts and price increases. The secret to surviving in this market is: when good things come, assess the risks first before acting, and never be brainwashed by words like "accessible to all."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#现实世界资产RWA代币化 Seeing the 17 trend predictions from a16z, I have to be honest — RWA tokenization excites me but also makes me cautious.
What excites me is that this truly represents a shift in direction. Moving from purely transaction-driven to infrastructure-driven indicates that the market is finally becoming more rational. Stablecoins are becoming the key for fiat on/off ramps, which means on-chain assets now have a real value anchor, no longer just castles in the air.
But there are more reasons to be wary. I've been in this space for many years and have seen too many "innovative concepts" turn into tools for harvesting retail investors. RWA sounds great — bringing real-world assets on-chain, making wealth management accessible to everyone — but where are the real issues? The problem lies in the emergence of many fake RWA projects during this process.
What does "native crypto approach" mean? Honestly, if you see a project claiming to tokenize real estate, bonds, or art, don’t rush in just yet. Ask yourself: Does the underlying asset truly exist? Is there a solid legal framework to protect it? Has the issuer been audited? Too many projects use the RWA label to issue tokens, but in reality, they are no different from traditional scams.
If 2026 truly becomes the year of RWA explosion, the risks will also grow exponentially. I recommend everyone start learning how to distinguish genuine from fake RWA now — look at the team background, legal compliance, whether there are real assets backing it — rather than just focusing on concepts and price increases. The secret to surviving in this market is: when good things come, assess the risks first before acting, and never be brainwashed by words like "accessible to all."