2026-01-20 00:26:44

In the crypto market, marketing tactics and public opinion guidance often spark a lot of imagination. For example, when certain well-known figures make a statement about a particular coin, it can immediately trigger a chain reaction—information dissemination, market sentiment heating up, and funds following the trend. Some people are pondering that instead of passively waiting for opportunities, it’s better to make proactive arrangements. Suppose someone first creates momentum, then uses endorsements from key figures to bring coins like DOGE or SHIB into the public eye; early investors who position themselves could indeed see their expected returns double. This logic has repeatedly played out in the past—an initial investment of 30 million yuan, leveraging precise information asymmetry and market cycles, can turn losses into profits in a short period. However, this also indicates that there is a delicate balance between market liquidity and emotional volatility, and investors often need to make decisions in environments of information asymmetry.

DOGE-2,59%

SHIB-2,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-20 00:54

Basically, it's the same old trick to cut leeks every time. Information gap equals wealth gap; those who understand are already making money. Isn't this just the old trick of the big players? Just switch to another coin. Those who knew this trick early on would have already jumped in; we're still here watching the news. Mastering the emotional cycle is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 01-20 00:53

Basically, it's just the story of the big players cutting the leeks, just told differently. The information gap has been played out, does anyone still believe it? Isn't this just a rug pull with a different disguise? Early ambush? Nice words, but it's actually gambling. Thirty million in hand, dreaming away. Emotional fluctuations? Just say it's a cut and done. Avoid places with lots of people, no good will come of it.

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 01-20 00:50

Basically, it's just a routine of cutting leeks, repeating the same coin type. This wave of manipulating public opinion is so old, who still believes it? 30 million startup capital? Where do ordinary people get the funds to play this game? Key figures make a statement and the price skyrockets, a typical information gap harvest. Early ambushes sound appealing, but it's actually a gambling mentality. Decision-making in an environment of information asymmetry? That’s just being harvested. Behind doubled returns are others losing money. It looks like an opportunity but it's actually a trap, no one warns you that the timing is the most dangerous. DOGE and SHIB have been pumped a few rounds, and people are still falling for it? This kind of early-stage layout has always been an insider game; retail investors, forget about it.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 01-20 00:36

ngl this is just ponzinomics with extra steps... the whole "early positioning" narrative conveniently ignores velocity traps and token utility fundamentals

Reply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-20 00:30

Basically, it's just a routine of cutting leeks; changing to a different coin and doing it all over again. Information asymmetry equals money difference. Those who knew early make a fortune, while latecomers suffer heavy losses. I see through this move; next time, I’ll buy the dip instead of chasing the high. That wave of DOGE definitely made some people a lot of money, but most bought at the top and got caught. The market is like this—whoever controls the rhythm is the big player. Why does it feel like the same script every time, just with a different protagonist? Thirty million becomes one billion; the story is always so exciting, but what about the risks? I'm just waiting to see who will take over in the next hot spot.

View OriginalReply0

CodeSmellHunter

· 01-20 00:29

Basically, it's just the ploy of the big players to harvest retail investors, just changing coins and names of celebrities. Information asymmetry is the biggest gold mine, but unfortunately, we're always behind. Isn't this just PnD... it should have been banned long ago. Thirty million times ten? Dream on, the risk is outrageously high. Wait, isn't this logic teaching people how to harvest retail investors? The ones who truly make money are never the ones following the trend. Market manipulation, once understood, is like this—terrifying. Making money through emotional swings... sounds exciting, but I think I'll just watch. That's why I don't touch meme coins; it's too easy to be harvested as retail investors. Doubling? First, see how many people lose their entire investment.

View OriginalReply0