There's a recurring disconnect in the Web3 space worth examining: many developers market themselves as privacy-focused, championing decentralization and user data sovereignty. Yet when users dig deeper, they often discover that personal information is still centralized on the developers' own servers rather than truly decentralized. This gap between privacy rhetoric and actual implementation raises legitimate questions about what "privacy-first" really means in practice. Are we seeing genuine privacy infrastructure, or just marketing framing? The infrastructure matters less than transparency—users deserve to know exactly where their data lives.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTPessimistvip
· 17h ago
Another bunch of privacy-first pretexts. I just want to know how many have truly decentralized, most still store on their own servers. Laugh out loud.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 17h ago
It's the same old trick again, talking up a storm, but the data still remains in their hands. Truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobovip
· 17h ago
It's the same old story again—talking about privacy first, but in reality, the data is still lying on their own servers.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)