I have been following the DUSK project for quite some time. Its core highlight is using the SBA consensus mechanism to balance privacy protection and compliance requirements; the dual-approach design is indeed unique. The application of zero-knowledge proof technology allows transaction information to be handled flexibly—privacy is needed when privacy is required, and verification when verification is needed. This level of controllability is rare in the industry.
In January this year, DuskEVM mainnet officially launched, marking an important milestone. Subsequently, they partnered with NPEX to implement a zero-trust custody solution. These real progress updates are reflected in the token price, which rose to $0.22. What I find even more promising is its potential in the RWA (Real-World Asset) track—combining privacy and compliance. For on-chain asset rights confirmation and regulated transactions, there is still a demand.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractTester
· 10h ago
Privacy + compliance is a combination I believe in; it is indeed the right way to open up RWA.
---
EVM has not made much splash since launch; whether the NPEX collaboration can truly land depends on subsequent implementation.
---
0.22 might still be a bit overestimated; the SBA mechanism sounds good, but how well it actually works remains to be seen.
---
The logic of walking on two legs is sound, but I'm just worried that in the end, both legs might be crippled.
---
The potential in this track is indeed huge, but there are already a lot of projects involved. Why does DUSK stand out in the positioning?
---
If zero-trust custody can truly be adopted by institutions, that would be a real trump card; small investors won't buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 10h ago
Dusk's approach is indeed different. Can privacy and compliance truly be achieved simultaneously?
Wait, I’m a bit unclear about the RWA part. What exactly is the demand there...
$0.22 is where we are now; is there still room for growth?
The mainnet launch and hosting collaborations have been finalized, so at least it's not just empty talk; we must acknowledge that.
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed innovating, but the real test lies in practical application.
SBA consensus balances privacy and compliance; I need to ponder this logic slowly.
How strong is the cooperation with NPEX? Could it just be superficial on paper?
The privacy chain path is rugged; how far Dusk can go is truly unknown.
The price increase has been so moderate, indicating the market hasn't fully realized the value yet.
I've been tracking this for a long time. Would you still dare to add to your position now?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 10h ago
Privacy + Compliance combo is indeed interesting, but can RWA really take off?
---
DuskEVM is online, but how's the ecosystem? It's still a bit quiet now, right?
---
Can you still chase 0.22? Feels like this pace is a bit slow, friends.
---
Does the zero-knowledge proof set really work in practical applications, or is it just theoretical?
---
NPEX collaboration sounds good, but is there really such a big market demand for this kind of custodial solution?
---
I just want to know what makes DuskEVM better than other privacy chains.
---
The RWA track is hyped up, but what about trading volume? Don't just talk about potential.
---
SBA consensus sounds high-level just from the name, but what do the real data say?
---
Walking on two legs is good, but the question is whether both legs can walk steadily.
---
The hard indicator is the token price reaching 0.22; everything else is just stories.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 10h ago
I need to take a closer look at the SBA consensus mechanism; verifying efficiency isn't the main issue... The key is how to ensure node stability.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 10h ago
Dusk's privacy + compliance logic really convinced me, but it still depends on how it will be implemented later.
They are skilled in zero-knowledge proofs, but is the RWA track really going to take off? I'm a bit skeptical.
The mainnet is live, and NPEX has also partnered up. The token price is only 0.22, so there’s still room for growth.
Projects that balance both sides are actually the most challenging for the team’s execution. Hope it doesn’t end in failure.
I haven't fully understood the SBA consensus yet. Can someone explain how the balancing method works?
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 10h ago
Privacy + compliance is really hitting the pain points, but it remains to be seen if it can truly be implemented later on.
RWA needs practical applications to support its rise; having just a technical framework is not enough.
0.22 still feels early; let's wait until the mainnet ecosystem is more developed.
Honestly, the SBA mechanism sounds advanced, but whether the market accepts it still needs to be verified.
Projects like DUSK are just bets on whether institutions will actually use them in the future; otherwise, it's just an illusion.
View OriginalReply0
PIStar_sBigSponge
· 10h ago
Then tell us your entry price and share some pictures.
I have been following the DUSK project for quite some time. Its core highlight is using the SBA consensus mechanism to balance privacy protection and compliance requirements; the dual-approach design is indeed unique. The application of zero-knowledge proof technology allows transaction information to be handled flexibly—privacy is needed when privacy is required, and verification when verification is needed. This level of controllability is rare in the industry.
In January this year, DuskEVM mainnet officially launched, marking an important milestone. Subsequently, they partnered with NPEX to implement a zero-trust custody solution. These real progress updates are reflected in the token price, which rose to $0.22. What I find even more promising is its potential in the RWA (Real-World Asset) track—combining privacy and compliance. For on-chain asset rights confirmation and regulated transactions, there is still a demand.