A prominent crypto industry executive has raised concerns about regulatory approaches, suggesting that certain protective measures may ultimately harm ordinary consumers rather than shield them. The critique centers on how existing safeguards could concentrate market advantages among established players, effectively transferring costs to everyday users and limiting competitive innovation in the digital asset space. This perspective reflects ongoing debate within the Web3 sector about balancing consumer protection with market accessibility and fair competition.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenDAOvip
· 16h ago
It's the same old trick again. Whenever regulators step in, it's a centralized trap. Entry costs double immediately, and small retail investors have no way out.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologistvip
· 16h ago
Basically, it's the old trick of big fish eating small fish, just under the guise of regulation to harvest the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 16h ago
Regulation, to put it nicely, is protection; in reality, it's just big players grabbing land.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 16h ago
Basically, it's just big fish eating small fish—a monopoly game under the guise of regulation.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 16h ago
It's the same old story again, with regulators helping big players monopolize.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt