Most AI projects have a straightforward logic—complete tasks, output results, move on to the next. Efficiency is paramount. But is this approach really enough?
Some teams are beginning to consider another dimension: what happens after the task is completed? Where exactly is the gap in user experience depth?
This difference in perspective may seem subtle, but from the user's point of view, the impact is significant. Are you interacting with a tool that can provide answers, or collaborating with an intelligent agent that truly understands your needs throughout the entire process? The experience is completely different. The former is a tool, the latter is a partner. This is also why some innovative projects are starting to redefine the role of AI agents in the Web3 ecosystem—not just focusing on execution efficiency, but on establishing ongoing, meaningful interactions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Degentleman
· 19h ago
The difference between tools and partners is a good idea, but to be honest, most projects are still just hyping concepts. How many can truly understand the entire process?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 19h ago
That's right. Currently, many AI projects are just focused on being fast and aggressive, without considering the real user experience.
The difference between tools and partners is indeed significant, but few projects can truly achieve the latter.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 19h ago
That's right. Currently, many AI projects are just task machines that spit out results and that's it. How can they create user engagement like this?
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 19h ago
The difference between tools and partners is indeed significant, but to be honest, most projects are still pretending to be partners. In reality, they are just tools + marketing talk.
Most AI projects have a straightforward logic—complete tasks, output results, move on to the next. Efficiency is paramount. But is this approach really enough?
Some teams are beginning to consider another dimension: what happens after the task is completed? Where exactly is the gap in user experience depth?
This difference in perspective may seem subtle, but from the user's point of view, the impact is significant. Are you interacting with a tool that can provide answers, or collaborating with an intelligent agent that truly understands your needs throughout the entire process? The experience is completely different. The former is a tool, the latter is a partner. This is also why some innovative projects are starting to redefine the role of AI agents in the Web3 ecosystem—not just focusing on execution efficiency, but on establishing ongoing, meaningful interactions.