A prominent crypto influencer's engagement manipulation scheme has been brought to light. According to industry observer ZachXBT's investigation, the creator behind the account had artificially inflated metrics across likes, replies, and follower counts. The underlying motivation appears clear: inflated engagement numbers served as a vehicle to attract lucrative undisclosed paid endorsement deals. Through a series of sponsored promotions and leveraging insider information, the individual reportedly accumulated millions of dollars. This pattern raises broader concerns about authenticity in the crypto influencer space—where inflated metrics can mask the true reach and influence of a creator, potentially misleading followers about the legitimacy of promoted projects and strategies. The case underscores why due diligence matters when evaluating crypto content creators and their recommendations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ponzi_poet
· 01-19 19:45
Damn, more data manipulation? When will this kind of trickery in the crypto world finally stop?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-19 19:39
It's the same old trick again, faking data to attract funds—really impressive.
A prominent crypto influencer's engagement manipulation scheme has been brought to light. According to industry observer ZachXBT's investigation, the creator behind the account had artificially inflated metrics across likes, replies, and follower counts. The underlying motivation appears clear: inflated engagement numbers served as a vehicle to attract lucrative undisclosed paid endorsement deals. Through a series of sponsored promotions and leveraging insider information, the individual reportedly accumulated millions of dollars. This pattern raises broader concerns about authenticity in the crypto influencer space—where inflated metrics can mask the true reach and influence of a creator, potentially misleading followers about the legitimacy of promoted projects and strategies. The case underscores why due diligence matters when evaluating crypto content creators and their recommendations.