I'm always interested in the tokenization of US stocks, and recently I delved into the structure and risks of CRCL. To be honest, security issues are indeed the biggest concern—risks like tokens being unredeemable, custodial institutions going bankrupt or running away, no matter how careful you are, these risks are unavoidable.
CRCL's design looks good, claiming a 1:1 reserve of real stocks, with assets held by regulated third parties like Swiss banks and Clearstream. Theoretically, it's quite stable, and the paper structure seems fine.
However, some details make me a bit cautious. Backed Finance is the issuer, and although their background is decent and they've attracted investments from institutions like Gnosis, all three co-founders come from DAOstack—the project whose token almost went to zero. I'm not saying they can't be used; there are many examples of turnaround in the crypto space. But from a safety-first perspective, this background warrants more consideration.
Practical experience also revealed issues. I tried it out recently, buying 500 shares, and the trading fee alone was nearly $300. The actual transaction price was quite different from my expectations. Currently, liquidity is really thin; buy and sell orders are not very active, which is especially unfriendly for large-volume trades.
Overall, I haven't found any fatal flaws in the product structure for now, but liquidity definitely needs improvement. The next step is to open a Hong Kong card account, set up the infrastructure first, and then gradually start dollar-cost averaging to test the waters.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainWinner
· 2h ago
Liquidity is indeed thin, and large inflows and outflows being exploited for profit is not worth it.
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 9h ago
With such poor liquidity, a slippage of 300 bucks can wipe you out. Who dares to make large transactions?
The DAOstack history does make people a bit uncomfortable; no matter how good the on-paper structure is, it can't withstand a trust crisis.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 9h ago
Such outrageous slippage fees, no wonder no one is playing...
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 9h ago
The DAOstack part does feel a bit off, the founders are all seasoned veterans who have had their share of failures... hard to say something nice about it.
A 300 yuan slippage fee is just bleeding users, with such thin liquidity, how can it possibly sustain?
The on-paper structure is fine, but the actual user experience is just stupid. This is a common problem with Web3 tokenization—ideals are grand, but reality is very tough.
Hong Kong card fixed investment is okay, but I advise you to first understand the compensation mechanism if the custodian suddenly collapses, so you won't regret losing everything in the end.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 9h ago
That part about DAOstack made me laugh. Even flipping guys can raise funds on Gnosis. That's how the crypto world is.
A slippage of 300 bucks to buy 500 shares—how painful must that be? With such poor liquidity, who dares to touch it?
First, get the Hong Kong card set up, and take it slow. No need to rush.
I'm always interested in the tokenization of US stocks, and recently I delved into the structure and risks of CRCL. To be honest, security issues are indeed the biggest concern—risks like tokens being unredeemable, custodial institutions going bankrupt or running away, no matter how careful you are, these risks are unavoidable.
CRCL's design looks good, claiming a 1:1 reserve of real stocks, with assets held by regulated third parties like Swiss banks and Clearstream. Theoretically, it's quite stable, and the paper structure seems fine.
However, some details make me a bit cautious. Backed Finance is the issuer, and although their background is decent and they've attracted investments from institutions like Gnosis, all three co-founders come from DAOstack—the project whose token almost went to zero. I'm not saying they can't be used; there are many examples of turnaround in the crypto space. But from a safety-first perspective, this background warrants more consideration.
Practical experience also revealed issues. I tried it out recently, buying 500 shares, and the trading fee alone was nearly $300. The actual transaction price was quite different from my expectations. Currently, liquidity is really thin; buy and sell orders are not very active, which is especially unfriendly for large-volume trades.
Overall, I haven't found any fatal flaws in the product structure for now, but liquidity definitely needs improvement. The next step is to open a Hong Kong card account, set up the infrastructure first, and then gradually start dollar-cost averaging to test the waters.