2026-01-19 16:22:06

$BNB holders should pay attention! Tomorrow, the new MMT coin will be listed, and the participation limit has been increased from the original 3 BNB to 7 BNB. This adjustment by a major exchange is probably due to the previous rounds of TGE oversubscription causing some annoyance. I've heard that some projects have been oversubscribed by tens of thousands of tokens, leading to highly fragmented liquidity. So now, they are clearly raising the participation threshold to indirectly filter the scale of participants.

Basically, this is a good signal for players with large holdings. The relaxed quota means more opportunities for real investments, and conversely, if the project itself has value, the big players will get a larger share without their cut being so fragmented. With less "participation noise" from retail investors, the profit distribution between the project team and major holders might become clearer. At least, there's no need to worry about liquidity being overly diluted.

BNB-3,25%

MMT-6,8%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVSandwich

· 12h ago

Well, I was saying, this wave is indeed a disguised way to cut retail investors. Big players are about to take off. The 7 BNB threshold, small investors simply can't afford it. This move by the exchange is a bit harsh. Haha, those overfunded crappy projects deserve to be weeded out, liquidity diluted to nothing. This time, we should be able to see clearly who is a real project and who is just air. Bet on MMT, it feels like the project team has a good idea of what's going on to dare to raise the limit this way.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-19 16:51

3BNB to flip 7? This exchange really can't afford retail investors anymore --- Again, oversubscribed. Feels like every TGE follows the same pattern --- Major investors are ecstatic, retail investors might as well change careers --- Liquidity has been diluted to the point of numbness. Raising the threshold this time seems inevitable --- So in the end, it's the big players banding together to dominate everything --- Clear profit distribution? Just listen, don't really believe it haha --- The threshold jumps from 3 to 7, I, a small fry, decide to keep watching the show --- This move is basically saying: retail investors, please take a detour --- Wait, is this screening participants or pushing people away? --- Oh wow, another "only we can play" game

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 01-19 16:49

7 BNB? That's a really tough threshold, retail investors are directly discouraged. --- They're still screening players, this exchange's tactics are becoming more and more familiar. --- Honestly, the oversubscription rounds really messed up the liquidity, so raising the threshold this time is understandable. --- Big players eat the meat, small retail investors drink the soup—that's the real story in the crypto world haha. --- 3 to 7 times profit? That's incredible, is this a disguised way to cut retail investors? --- Wait, with such screening, can the project really succeed? Or is it just another trap to harvest the chives? --- Liquidity is clearer now, but so are the risks. Being cautious is the way to go. --- With this threshold, I can't even invest, but watching the big players fight each other is quite interesting. --- It seems this round of adjustments is mainly a reactive measure against those bad projects from before. --- Small wallets are completely out of the game; the crypto world is gradually turning into a playground for big players.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 01-19 16:46

Investing with 7 BNB? Retail investors are really about to be discouraged. --- Here comes another new trick to cut leeks—raising the threshold is just called filtering. I think it's just because they're afraid too many retail investors will dump the market. --- Wait, the point about liquidity dilution makes sense, but the problem is if the project itself is bad, even fewer retail investors won't help. --- Big players are thrilled; they finally get to compete less with retail investors. Whether this coin MMT is good or not depends on its subsequent performance. --- 3 becoming 7? Is the exchange hinting that there's a problem with this project? I'm starting to understand less and less. --- Well said, but in reality, it's still about finding ways to cut money. The priority for big players has always been there. --- Liquidity dispersion is indeed annoying, but raising the threshold can't solve the problem of a bad project. --- Interesting. By filtering out like this, truly valuable projects can stand out, and fake altcoins will die off. --- I’ll pass on holding less BNB; anyway, big players making money has nothing to do with me.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-19 16:45

From 3 BNB skyrocketing directly to 7, this exchange is really getting anxious. Retail investors, it's time to wake up. The feast for the big players has begun. It's the same old trick: raising the threshold to indirectly push people out. I just want to see if MMT is worth this price.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 01-19 16:44

7 BNB? That's a really tough threshold; retail investors are directly out. --- Well... It's definitely satisfying for big players to share the cake, but the project itself needs to have real value, otherwise no matter how much screening is done, it’s still zero. --- What happened to those oversubscribed projects before? Why are they still daring to play now? --- It's called screening in a nice way, but in harsh terms, it's just another expensive ticket to cut the leeks. --- Liquidity is clear... just listen, anyway, listing won't reduce the hits. --- Starting with 7 BNB, it feels like this round of traders is a bit anxious. Were they really scared before? --- Big players definitely have many advantages, but more and more of these projects are emerging, and there’s always a risk of a crash.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-19 16:25

The trick of doubling the limit is basically just chasing away retail investors. Big players are thrilled. Raising the threshold can indeed block most small investors, but the project team needs real skills to do so. Starting at 7 BNB, this funding round has a clear shift in direction, aiming for serious money. The issue of liquidity dispersion will inevitably have someone taking the blame; it seems this time the exchange has decided to let the big players handle it. Not optimistic about the project's true value, only looking at limit changes actually increases the risk. MMK, the big player screening system has begun. Truly valuable projects will still come through. This move is interesting, effectively a disguised form of capital review. The 7 BNB threshold has deterred many small investors. If the project itself has no story, no matter how the limit is adjusted, it’s all in vain.

View OriginalReply0