The $WAL token unlock issue has recently attracted a lot of attention, but not many people truly understand how the unlocking works or what impact it will have on the market. I spent some time studying their release schedule and found several interesting details.
Generally speaking, tokens allocated to the team and advisors are linearly unlocked over four years, which is well-known. However, there are two other aspects that are often overlooked: one is the Ecosystem Growth Fund, which has a more flexible release schedule decided by DAO voting, but still releases a fixed amount each month. The other is the Partner Incentive Pool, which will start gradually releasing tokens to early integrated projects from Q4 of this year.
This means that over the next six months to a year, the market will face not only normal circulating supply but also potential "new supply" from these two sources. While we can monitor the wallets of the team and advisors, predicting how project teams that receive incentives will handle their tokens is more difficult. Some may lock their tokens long-term, while others might sell to subsidize operations.
This kind of selling pressure from different directions is a long-term factor from a structural perspective. It’s not enough to look only at circulating market cap; valuation models must incorporate the impact of these factors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomad
· 01-22 12:45
That's why WAL is easily underestimated. Most people only focus on team unlocks and don't realize that ecosystem funds and partner incentives are also quietly selling off.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 01-19 14:52
Selling pressure comes from all directions. Who knows if the tokens held by the project team will be dumped... This is the real hidden bomb.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-19 14:51
It sounds like the incentive pool is indeed a hidden minefield. No one can predict how the project team will handle their tokens, and that's the most unpredictable variable.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-19 14:41
So, the ecosystem funds and partner incentives are the real ticking time bombs, while the team wallets are not that scary.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 01-19 14:40
The release of the ecological fund is decided by DAO voting. To put it simply, it depends on what the governance token holders think. This thing ultimately is a power game.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 01-19 14:36
Selling pressure is coming. The real killer is the monthly releases from the ecosystem fund... Project teams get incentives and then dump, no one can predict it.
The $WAL token unlock issue has recently attracted a lot of attention, but not many people truly understand how the unlocking works or what impact it will have on the market. I spent some time studying their release schedule and found several interesting details.
Generally speaking, tokens allocated to the team and advisors are linearly unlocked over four years, which is well-known. However, there are two other aspects that are often overlooked: one is the Ecosystem Growth Fund, which has a more flexible release schedule decided by DAO voting, but still releases a fixed amount each month. The other is the Partner Incentive Pool, which will start gradually releasing tokens to early integrated projects from Q4 of this year.
This means that over the next six months to a year, the market will face not only normal circulating supply but also potential "new supply" from these two sources. While we can monitor the wallets of the team and advisors, predicting how project teams that receive incentives will handle their tokens is more difficult. Some may lock their tokens long-term, while others might sell to subsidize operations.
This kind of selling pressure from different directions is a long-term factor from a structural perspective. It’s not enough to look only at circulating market cap; valuation models must incorporate the impact of these factors.