Who really sets the rules? Think about it—in SignalCraft or any AI system, it's ultimately humans defining the boundaries. We aren't just passive users; we're actively shaping what AI can and cannot do. The fence the system operates within? That's on us.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClub
· 12h ago
Basically, we have to take responsibility for AI's issues; we can't pass the buck to the machine.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 12h ago
Basically, we're putting shackles on AI and then pretending to have more say than we actually do. It's a bit funny.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 12h ago
That's correct, but the problem is that most people have no idea what they are "shaping."
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 12h ago
That's true, but it depends on who is setting the rules... Larger capital has more influence, right?
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 12h ago
Basically, it's humans digging their own graves and then blaming everything else.
Who really sets the rules? Think about it—in SignalCraft or any AI system, it's ultimately humans defining the boundaries. We aren't just passive users; we're actively shaping what AI can and cannot do. The fence the system operates within? That's on us.