2026-01-19 11:46:23

Remember when frankdegods was all the rage during the AI meta boom? The project saw massive hype and investment, but once the trend shifted and AI narratives cooled down, the momentum vanished. Now that it's crashed, everyone's pointing fingers—but the real question is: who bears responsibility when these trend-driven projects implode? The cycle repeats: hype peaks, late money pours in, reality sets, and then the blame game begins. This is a classic case of how narrative-driven projects can crumble once the market loses interest.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenApeSurfer

· 1h ago

Basically, it's just chasing the hot trend and getting cut off. The frankdegods incident is a typical example of a money-grabbing scheme targeting newcomers.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 1h ago

This is the usual operation in the crypto world. Chasing the hot trends will lead to early or late death; you will eventually die.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 1h ago

It's the same old story. When the trend is hot, pigs fly and people believe; when it cools down, they start shifting blame. Projects like frankdegods are just hype-driven concepts. Early investors made a killing, while bagholders suffered huge losses. What responsibility? Poor DYOR (Do Your Own Research) is the real culprit. When AI is hot, everything can rise. Now it's time to stay calm. Honestly, riding the wave was fun, but it's too late to cry and complain now. This is the crypto world. By the way, how many people are still bottom-fishing this thing...

View OriginalReply0

LazyDevMiner