Each project has to make its own decision about whether to reward the community. For projects like Miden, they can make independent decisions. This is the project's right. Kaito itself has restricted the incentivized advertising feature—the leaderboard is mainly used to display information. However, leaderboards are indeed useful; they allow the community to clearly see contribution levels, with transparent data displayed openly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForumLurker
· 3h ago
I agree that transparency in the ranking list is important, but honestly, projects need to be willing to provide incentives genuinely; otherwise, all the contributions are just for show.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 3h ago
There's really no doubt about transparency, but the true motivation comes from the project itself.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 3h ago
Rankings are, to be honest, just about data transparency. Don't overthink it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 4h ago
The project makes autonomous decisions, which is correct. However, the transparency of the leaderboard definitely deserves praise.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 4h ago
Rankings are, frankly, a double-edged sword. Transparency is good, but when cultural comparisons come into play, some people will feel uncomfortable.
Each project has to make its own decision about whether to reward the community. For projects like Miden, they can make independent decisions. This is the project's right. Kaito itself has restricted the incentivized advertising feature—the leaderboard is mainly used to display information. However, leaderboards are indeed useful; they allow the community to clearly see contribution levels, with transparent data displayed openly.