2026-01-19 11:22:52

Options seller neutral strategies continue to set new highs. After systematically studying 6-8 sets of neutral strategies with a bias towards selling last year, the account has not stopped breaking through in the past year—from not worrying about the direction of BTC's rise or fall, to seeking arbitrage opportunities within volatility structures. This is the true core competitiveness.

Currently, the market is relatively calm, making it the best window for in-depth research into quantitative arbitrage. Whether in the crypto market or US stocks, the logic of these strategies can be fully applied across asset classes. Mastering the underlying methodology of options neutral trading is fundamental to surviving long-term in the derivatives market. Opportunities can be found in different market cycles; the key is understanding the mathematical models and risk management frameworks behind the strategies.

BTC-2,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningWallet

· 5h ago

Seller neutrality is truly amazing; this is the real way to sit back and win. Volatility arbitrage > directional judgment; it should have been played this way all along. During calm periods, focus on research; don't follow the crowd and chase highs blindly. This logic spans both crypto and US stocks; there's some real substance here. Neutral strategies test the risk control system; don't touch them without it. Last year's returns broke records; I'm genuinely envious. Only after mastering the mathematical models can you dare to bet; otherwise, it's just gambling. Long-term survival depends on this kind of strategic framework, not luck. The structure of volatility is very deep; it takes time to understand it thoroughly. The most challenging underlying logic for a flat market is the strategy itself.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisfit

· 5h ago

Volatility arbitrage is truly the ultimate, and not chasing the ups and downs is actually more stable. Seller neutral is indeed the way out for working folks; stacking 6-8 frameworks continuously yields profits. The calm period actually tests skills the most, but most people are just slackening off. I agree that cross-asset logic is universal; mathematical models are the real heroes. To be honest, most people simply don't understand volatility structures and are still betting on directions. The most ruthless aspect of neutral strategies is that they can profit even in bad markets, now that's real skill.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 5h ago

This wave of seller strategies is indeed ruthless. I respect the fact that there's no gamble on the direction. Mining in the volatility structure sounds simple, but how much brainpower does it really take to do it? A calm market is actually an opportunity? Alright, I believe you. The neutral strategy logic can be applied across assets; I feel the US stock market can also give it a try. To put it plainly, the most critical part is still the risk control model. How exaggerated does the account growth curve have to be to hit a new high? Once the mathematical model is well done, no matter how the market moves, it won't scare you. That's the top-tier approach.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 5h ago

Volatility structure arbitrage is indeed interesting, much clearer than simply betting on the direction. --- I'm also researching market-neutral strategies, but I haven't fully understood that mathematical model... Looks like I need to dig deeper. --- Is it actually most profitable during calm periods? This idea is a bit counterintuitive, but it seems to be true. --- The key is the risk management framework, which many people actually overlook. --- I didn't expect cross-asset applications—can the logic of US stock options be directly applied to the crypto space? --- Last year's continuous breakthroughs—this is the power of quant... Much more reliable than me worrying about ups and downs every day.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 5h ago

The seller's neutral strategy is indeed fierce; volatility structure arbitrage is much more reliable than betting on direction. However, this stuff really requires time to study deeply. It sounds simple, but actually implementing it is another matter. The calm period is the best time to ponder, makes sense. This approach can also be applied to the US stock market, quite interesting. Mastering mathematical models and risk control is the key, makes perfect sense. Neutral strategies are hitting new highs continuously; envy those who consistently profit. Is it hard to find arbitrage opportunities in volatility? Please advise. Seller strategies need good risk control to survive long. The market usually looks for opportunities, this is indeed the strongest trading logic. Have you studied 6-8 framework systems systematically? Sounds like it took a lot of effort.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 5h ago

Volatility arbitrage is really powerful; instead of guessing the ups and downs, you can earn more steadily. Neutral strategies are indeed more reliable than betting on directions; this guy knows his stuff. The calm period is the best time to sharpen your tools; you'll see the difference when the wind comes. Applying this idea across assets feels a bit presumptuous. Just talking about mathematical models and risk frameworks, the real test is in practical implementation. This approach is good, but it requires enough capital to play effectively. I feel that seller strategies have a ceiling; when volatility reaches extremes, they are easily swept away. After trying so many frameworks, it ultimately comes down to who has stronger execution. Breaking new highs looks exciting, but strategies like these often have a one-step withdrawal.

View OriginalReply0