2026-01-19 11:21:36

The token supply structure of the Cannabis project is worth noting. According to on-chain data, insiders hold approximately 7.9% of the circulating supply, with the team accounting for 6%, of which 3.8% is locked for 450 days. Interestingly, the developers stated that there have been no sniper attacks on the project.

From an on-chain perspective, Tuults is a significant holder in the project. In the Bubble Map analysis, a certain address holds 3.3% of the supply, with relatively low trading activity. Such concentration is not uncommon in early-stage projects. Additionally, some distribution characteristics are observed among addresses related to CEX. Overall, the supply chain distribution is relatively balanced, with no red flags indicating excessive concentration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemeTokenGenius

· 2h ago

Ha, another project claiming no red flags... Why do I find it hard to believe? --- 7.9% internal holdings, this proportion is actually okay, just worried about a slow dump later --- Lockup for 450 days? Sounds good, but who still believes in that these days... --- Supply chain balance, huh? Let's see how it performs later. Anyway, I'm just watching for now --- Tuults holding 3.3%, low trading volume? That's what I care about, maybe there's real confidence --- No sniper sounds too perfect, I have to question that --- Early project concentration is normal, I get it. Just see if the team really has ideas --- No details on CEX holdings distribution, I feel like something's missing

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 2h ago

Team lock-up for 6 months only 3.8%? That's a bit disappointing. Is this how early-stage projects usually are...

View OriginalReply0

ChainMaskedRider

· 2h ago

It seems that the distribution is relatively balanced, without a dominant single entity. However, the 3.3% concentrated in one address is still interesting; it all depends on how things develop moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer

· 2h ago

When Bitcoin drops, I get annoyed. I'm tired of the team locking tokens for 450 days as a strategy. --- Is the supply distribution balanced? Then I can rest assured. It's much better than those projects where a single address holds 50%. --- Wait, Tuults holding 3.3% makes it an "important holder"? That's a bit of a stretch. --- No snipers? Alright, I believe you this time. --- It's normal for early projects to have high concentration. The key is whether there are real use cases later on.

View OriginalReply0