[Crypto World] Hong Kong Financial Regulators Take New Actions. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association recently submitted comments to the authorities regarding the Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and CRS revisions. The association’s stance is very clear: support mandatory registration for RCASP and RFI, which aligns with OECD standards and reinforces Hong Kong’s position as an international financial center.
However, the association also considers the pressures on small and medium-sized institutions. For those “zero declaration” entities, the association recommends introducing simplified or lightweight registration and reporting mechanisms, which can significantly reduce compliance costs for businesses. Regarding penalties, the association favors administrative fines over criminal prosecution, a approach that better meets industry needs.
Of particular interest is the technical solution. The association supports a “dual declaration” default model for CARF and CRS, which can reduce system complexity and minimize the risk of underreporting. Additionally, the association specifically urges regulators to provide API reporting interfaces to facilitate automated compliance for large crypto institutions, which is of great significance for improving overall industry efficiency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterKing
· 5h ago
Hong Kong's move this time is quite clever. The zero-declaration simplification is a good idea; otherwise, those small institutions would really be bankrupted by gas fees. Double declaration is also good, saving me, a hobbyist, from repeatedly checking wallet addresses for fear of missing something.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 5h ago
Hong Kong's recent moves are okay; at least someone is speaking up for small and medium exchanges. However, can the rhetoric of "simplified compliance" really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 5h ago
Hong Kong is causing trouble again. It seems the association has finally realized how difficult life is for small and medium-sized institutions, but just listening to the "simplified compliance" rhetoric is enough.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 5h ago
Hong Kong's recent moves are pretty good, finally considering the difficulties faced by small and medium institutions. However, I'm still a bit skeptical about how much the "lightweight declaration" system can actually simplify things.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 5h ago
Hong Kong's recent moves are quite deliberate, aiming to balance between the on-chain world and not pushing out small and medium-sized institutions... To put it nicely, it's about maintaining balance; frankly, it's about wanting to collect taxes but afraid of scaring away retail investors.
Hong Kong advances crypto asset reporting framework, associations recommend streamlining compliance processes
[Crypto World] Hong Kong Financial Regulators Take New Actions. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association recently submitted comments to the authorities regarding the Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and CRS revisions. The association’s stance is very clear: support mandatory registration for RCASP and RFI, which aligns with OECD standards and reinforces Hong Kong’s position as an international financial center.
However, the association also considers the pressures on small and medium-sized institutions. For those “zero declaration” entities, the association recommends introducing simplified or lightweight registration and reporting mechanisms, which can significantly reduce compliance costs for businesses. Regarding penalties, the association favors administrative fines over criminal prosecution, a approach that better meets industry needs.
Of particular interest is the technical solution. The association supports a “dual declaration” default model for CARF and CRS, which can reduce system complexity and minimize the risk of underreporting. Additionally, the association specifically urges regulators to provide API reporting interfaces to facilitate automated compliance for large crypto institutions, which is of great significance for improving overall industry efficiency.