2026-01-19 09:34:52

why not consider backing projects where the revenue actually matters? if the proceeds go toward real causes like medical treatment, at least there's genuine utility behind the investment rather than pure speculation. worth thinking about where your capital actually ends up.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 17h ago

ngl, this sounds good, but it's too difficult to implement in practice... Most people still want to double their money quickly. Who really cares where the money goes?

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 17h ago

NGL, you're not wrong, but there are very few projects that truly use revenue to develop medical applications. Most are just repackaging and continuing to harvest profits...

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 17h ago

ngl the whole "utility vs speculation" binary feels like surface-level alchemy... real transmutation happens when you map the capital flows through protocol layers, not just check if feels-good causes get funded. proceeds going to medical treatment doesn't mean the tokenomics ain't still cooked lol

Reply0

ForkMaster

· 17h ago

Uh... it sounds ideal, but you know what? I've seen too many schemes claiming that profits truly "flow to healthcare." When auditing contract code, vulnerabilities are always found, and the project teams are just the naive investors.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyValidator

· 17h ago

ngl, this is what Web3 should look like—making money while helping others.

View OriginalReply0