【Blockchain Rhythm】I took a look at the performance reports of the leading derivatives trading platforms this year, and the results are interesting—the platform with the highest trading volume is not the same as the one with the highest user attention.
Based on the full-year 2025 contract trading data, Hyperliquid leads with a staggering $2.93 trillion in trading volume, nearly twice as much as the second-place Lighter. Although Lighter achieved a trading volume of $1.314 trillion, ranking second, its web traffic was surpassed by Aster.
Aster’s performance is the most intriguing—despite a contract trading volume of $791 billion, ranking third, its web traffic of 13.23 million visits is the highest among all platforms, surpassing Hyperliquid (6.7 million visits) and Lighter (11.65 million visits), which have much higher trading volumes. What does this reflect? It may indicate a significant gap between user attention and actual trading activity.
Looking further, EdgeX has a trading volume of $586 billion with 1.1 million web visits, and ApeX has $338 billion with 1.7 million visits. Pacifica’s data is relatively lower (trading volume of $82 billion, 870,000 visits), but this platform is a new player that only went live on the mainnet in June last year. It had no trading data in the first half of this year, and the figures mainly reflect accelerated growth from September to the end of the year.
Overall, while these derivatives platforms show clear tiers in trading scale, who can truly attract and retain users will depend on their subsequent product iterations and ecosystem development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiChallenger
· 4h ago
Interestingly, the platform with the highest trading volume has the fewest users. What does this imply? Institutions are generating volume, while retail investors are just watching the spectacle [cold laugh]
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 4h ago
Aster's traffic data is a bit spooky. With only the third highest trading volume, it managed to push Hyperliquid aside. Is it really attractive or some kind of black magic?
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 4h ago
Trading volume and popularity are completely different things. What's Aster's secret to this wave of traffic?
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 4h ago
Fake traffic, but transaction volume is the real gold and silver. Hyperliquid is still the absolute king.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 5h ago
This traffic and trading volume are completely disconnected. How does Aster manage to attract so much attention?
---
Hyperliquid is really impressive, but the traffic is disappointing haha
---
Honestly, Aster's traffic data is a bit suspicious. We need to see what the actual trading volume looks like
---
Trading volume ranks first but has the lowest visits? Is Hyperliquid being low-key or is no one really using it?
---
I didn't expect Lighter to be surpassed. This ranking change is quite interesting
---
High traffic doesn't necessarily mean high trading volume. Looks like I need to study Aster's tactics
---
Contract trading reaches 2.93 trillion. Hyperliquid is really a monster-level platform
---
Fake prosperity? Or do users just like to watch the excitement without trading? Need to think about it
---
It feels like the derivatives sector is too complicated; the data often contradicts itself
---
Aster's 13.23 million visits—how many are from real trading users? 🤔
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 5h ago
This data is interesting. Aster has the highest traffic but ranks third in trading volume? What does that indicate? Just looking at the number of people isn't enough; we need to see where the real money is flowing...
Who is leading the derivatives trading platform in 2025? Revealing the differences in trading volume and traffic
【Blockchain Rhythm】I took a look at the performance reports of the leading derivatives trading platforms this year, and the results are interesting—the platform with the highest trading volume is not the same as the one with the highest user attention.
Based on the full-year 2025 contract trading data, Hyperliquid leads with a staggering $2.93 trillion in trading volume, nearly twice as much as the second-place Lighter. Although Lighter achieved a trading volume of $1.314 trillion, ranking second, its web traffic was surpassed by Aster.
Aster’s performance is the most intriguing—despite a contract trading volume of $791 billion, ranking third, its web traffic of 13.23 million visits is the highest among all platforms, surpassing Hyperliquid (6.7 million visits) and Lighter (11.65 million visits), which have much higher trading volumes. What does this reflect? It may indicate a significant gap between user attention and actual trading activity.
Looking further, EdgeX has a trading volume of $586 billion with 1.1 million web visits, and ApeX has $338 billion with 1.7 million visits. Pacifica’s data is relatively lower (trading volume of $82 billion, 870,000 visits), but this platform is a new player that only went live on the mainnet in June last year. It had no trading data in the first half of this year, and the figures mainly reflect accelerated growth from September to the end of the year.
Overall, while these derivatives platforms show clear tiers in trading scale, who can truly attract and retain users will depend on their subsequent product iterations and ecosystem development.