People often cherry-pick the best performance years. But let's be real—check the full track record. There's an entire 8-year stretch where that asset massively underperformed Bitcoin. Not saying BTC never has rough patches, it does. The thing is, when you zoom out and look at the bigger picture, the long-term comparison tells a completely different story. Those boom periods get all the attention, sure. But what about the years when everything else was lagging behind? Portfolio allocation isn't just about chasing the hottest performer in any given year—it's about understanding the actual historical trends.

BTC-2,33%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearHuggervip
· 1h ago
Nonsense, underperforming for 8 years and then dismissing the entire asset? BTC doesn't always win either.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealervip
· 1h ago
Honestly, following an 8-year long cycle is the way to go; short-term surges are just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 1h ago
That flaw from 8 years ago really hit the nerve, you can't just look at bull market data.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFillervip
· 1h ago
8 years of lying flat compared to BTC, this gap really can't be sustained anymore
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingersvip
· 1h ago
ngl that's why I never believe those show-off data, finishing last for 8 years is really outrageous
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 1h ago
Can't beat Bitcoin in 8 years? Then this project is definitely a bit questionable.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)