Projects like Bags are getting faster and faster each time. As soon as someone who receives the money says, "This has nothing to do with me," it instantly drops to zero in no time. This is completely different from our idea of memecoin😂
On the other hand, the situation on BNB Chain is different. Those who truly build communities, holding only 100U, wouldn't dare to say it has nothing to do with them — because they simply don't use that kind of rhetoric. This is the difference in on-chain ecology.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWhisperer
· 13h ago
the collapse velocity on these bags is actually predictable if you map the mempool patterns... insiders always leak their exit intent before the dump. bnb community holders? they're just operating on different incentive mechanics entirely, ngl
Reply0
DaoResearcher
· 13h ago
From the perspective of governance failure, this is the collapse of the incentive mechanism under token weighted voting — the project team has not established an effective interest binding, so once cash-outters appear, the entire consensus collapses. It is worth noting that the community stickiness data on BNB Chain looks significantly better, but I need to review the on-chain interaction data to understand what specific mechanism is responsible.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 14h ago
The speed is ridiculously fast, almost to the point of not seeing any signs of people haha
Projects like Bags are getting faster and faster each time. As soon as someone who receives the money says, "This has nothing to do with me," it instantly drops to zero in no time. This is completely different from our idea of memecoin😂
On the other hand, the situation on BNB Chain is different. Those who truly build communities, holding only 100U, wouldn't dare to say it has nothing to do with them — because they simply don't use that kind of rhetoric. This is the difference in on-chain ecology.