Having navigated the blockchain space for years, the biggest regret is seeing some projects holding core technologies but failing to overcome the hurdle of commercial implementation. DUSK is a typical example—claiming to be privacy-compliant and aiming to make a mark in the RWA track, yet on-chain data has long revealed the true situation clearly.
Data from the end of last year shows that the DUSK mainnet has surpassed a block height of 109,000. The average block time of 2 seconds is technically no problem, but what about the block utilization rate—it's ridiculously low. Over 70% of blocks contain fewer than 2 transactions, often resulting in consecutive empty blocks. The daily transaction volume barely exceeds 1,000, which is hardly comparable to mainstream public chains. The total daily active addresses on the network are fewer than 80, even after excluding a large number of project team wallets; actual user participation is essentially zero. Compared to a project focused on institutional-grade financial infrastructure, these numbers are almost fatal.
Liquidity issues have yet to be resolved. Major data platforms cannot find independent TVL for DUSK. The trading pairs on a leading DEX are locked in at around $270,000, and they rely on extremely high APYs like 128% to attract users, which precisely indicates how fragile the liquidity pools are. The DuskEVM mainnet launch has repeatedly been postponed, and aside from the block explorer, there are almost no ecological applications on the testnet. The so-called ecosystem projects haven't taken off either, making it impossible to support normal trading demand.
The staking aspect is also vague. The threshold of 1,000 DUSK seems reasonable, but the official stance on yields has been ambiguous—only mentioning "geometric decay release," combined with a 4.8-hour lock-up period, making it hardly attractive. Competitors outside are not idle—Polygon CDK, Oasis Network, and others are leading in ecosystem maturity and resource integration. After so many years of development, the results DUSK has delivered are truly disappointing.
In short, although privacy compliance is a selling point for this project, without real ecosystem applications to support it, this selling point is just superficial. If they don't accelerate the mainnet launch and develop real RWA scenarios, no matter how advanced the technology is, they will be eliminated by the market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Deconstructionist
· 16h ago
80 active addresses? Laughing to death, isn't this just the team playing themselves?
---
Another project with a technical ceiling and an application floor, common everywhere
---
128% APY but still can't attract liquidity? That's ridiculous, it shows no one trusts it
---
The gap between the RWA dream and the reality of thousands of daily transactions is really huge
---
Continuous empty blocks, isn't this just a crazy waste of block space?
---
Privacy compliance sounds high-end, but the ecosystem is zero, just talk on paper
---
So many mainnet delays, yet it’s still alive, as long as the token price doesn’t crash
---
Polygon and Oasis are both competing, what has DUSK been holding back all these years?
---
Locking 1000 DUSK for 4.8 hours to earn what? It’s not as stable as a fixed deposit
---
Can’t find TVL, is it really none or just deliberately hidden?
---
No matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses it, it’s useless, that’s DUSK’s fate
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 16h ago
The technology is strong, but on-chain data doesn't lie... The situation with DUSK is a bit exhausting to watch.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 16h ago
Another technically impressive project that fails in implementation, a typical "armchair strategist."
70% empty blocks? Less than 80 daily active users? And they still dare to call it institutional-grade infrastructure—laughable.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 16h ago
Once again, the old trick of good technology but a completely ruined ecosystem. I'm tired of this DUSK routine.
---
128% APY still can't attract people? What does that mean? It means this pool has been rotten for a long time.
---
Privacy compliance sounds very impressive, but no one actually uses it, which is quite embarrassing.
---
Over a hundred thousand block heights only yield eighty active addresses, which is really a bit ironic.
---
A project focusing on institutional financial infrastructure, yet its liquidity is even worse than some small coins. Truly remarkable.
---
Polygon and Oasis have long mastered the RWA sector. Is it a bit late for DUSK to wake up now?
---
Stop always shouting about advanced technology; ecosystem is the key. A chain without users is just a zombie chain.
---
The phrase "flower fist embroidery legs" is used perfectly. No matter how beautiful the technical specifications are written, they are useless.
---
The 4.8-hour staking lock-up period is still vague. No wonder no one comes. How does that compare?
---
On-chain data tells the truth. 70% of blocks contain fewer than 2 transactions, which already explains a lot.
Having navigated the blockchain space for years, the biggest regret is seeing some projects holding core technologies but failing to overcome the hurdle of commercial implementation. DUSK is a typical example—claiming to be privacy-compliant and aiming to make a mark in the RWA track, yet on-chain data has long revealed the true situation clearly.
Data from the end of last year shows that the DUSK mainnet has surpassed a block height of 109,000. The average block time of 2 seconds is technically no problem, but what about the block utilization rate—it's ridiculously low. Over 70% of blocks contain fewer than 2 transactions, often resulting in consecutive empty blocks. The daily transaction volume barely exceeds 1,000, which is hardly comparable to mainstream public chains. The total daily active addresses on the network are fewer than 80, even after excluding a large number of project team wallets; actual user participation is essentially zero. Compared to a project focused on institutional-grade financial infrastructure, these numbers are almost fatal.
Liquidity issues have yet to be resolved. Major data platforms cannot find independent TVL for DUSK. The trading pairs on a leading DEX are locked in at around $270,000, and they rely on extremely high APYs like 128% to attract users, which precisely indicates how fragile the liquidity pools are. The DuskEVM mainnet launch has repeatedly been postponed, and aside from the block explorer, there are almost no ecological applications on the testnet. The so-called ecosystem projects haven't taken off either, making it impossible to support normal trading demand.
The staking aspect is also vague. The threshold of 1,000 DUSK seems reasonable, but the official stance on yields has been ambiguous—only mentioning "geometric decay release," combined with a 4.8-hour lock-up period, making it hardly attractive. Competitors outside are not idle—Polygon CDK, Oasis Network, and others are leading in ecosystem maturity and resource integration. After so many years of development, the results DUSK has delivered are truly disappointing.
In short, although privacy compliance is a selling point for this project, without real ecosystem applications to support it, this selling point is just superficial. If they don't accelerate the mainnet launch and develop real RWA scenarios, no matter how advanced the technology is, they will be eliminated by the market.