Before diving into the technical details, here's the real story behind my infrastructure approach.
I deployed most of my tech stack to Solana's devnet. Sounds like a step back? Not really.
Here's why: running Anchor programs on mainnet comes with real costs. So the smart move was pushing everything to devnet first. Build out the infrastructure there, stress test the whole system, make sure it actually works before going live.
Once I proved the model could hold up—that's when the mainnet transition makes sense. You validate everything, control your spending, and dodge unnecessary transaction fees during development. It's not about cutting corners; it's about being strategic with resources while building on Solana.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityJanitor
· 4h ago
Smart people do this: develop on devnet until it's well-fed before going live
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 4h ago
Test on devnet first before going live on the mainnet—that's the right way to play Solana.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 4h ago
Devnet first test, this approach is solid. Saving gas fees is really a great idea.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 4h ago
Testing on devnet first is indeed more cost-effective, but I still want to see if any issues will arise when finally launching on mainnet.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 4h ago
Devnet validation first before going live on the mainnet, that's indeed more sensible.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 4h ago
Wow, isn't this the on-chain version of DCA? Test on devnet first, then go live on mainnet. Let the data speak(◍•ᴗ•◕)
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 4h ago
Devnet first for testing and then move to mainnet. This approach is actually very clear.
Before diving into the technical details, here's the real story behind my infrastructure approach.
I deployed most of my tech stack to Solana's devnet. Sounds like a step back? Not really.
Here's why: running Anchor programs on mainnet comes with real costs. So the smart move was pushing everything to devnet first. Build out the infrastructure there, stress test the whole system, make sure it actually works before going live.
Once I proved the model could hold up—that's when the mainnet transition makes sense. You validate everything, control your spending, and dodge unnecessary transaction fees during development. It's not about cutting corners; it's about being strategic with resources while building on Solana.