There's a telling pattern here: when people lose the ability to own things, they stop grasping how systems actually work. Property ownership teaches you something fundamental about society that renting never can.



Consider any homeowner—they've had their eyes opened to forces most renters never encounter. The moment you remove genuine ownership from an equation, people disconnect from responsibility. Without skin in the game, society becomes incomprehensible, almost magical. They spectate rather than participate.

This is why engagement drops off a cliff. Strip away ownership and you strip away the motivation to protect or improve what you're part of.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 7h ago
NGL, this logic doesn't quite hold up. The rental group I know may not be less concerned about society than homeowners...
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuthvip
· 7h ago
That makes sense, but Web3 is all about changing this. True asset ownership returns to the users—that's the fundamental point.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 7h ago
That's right, that's why so many people just complain about the system being unfair but never actually think about getting involved to make a change... Without ownership, it's really different.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 8h ago
NGL, this view is a bit too idealistic. Only wealthy people can buy houses, bro.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)