Recently, there was a quite interesting case—Aster announced the activation of its strategic buyback reserve and the launch of an automatic buyback mechanism. This is based on their Phase 5 buyback plan announced last month.
The core logic is straightforward: 20-40% of the platform's daily generated fees are used for targeted ASTER token buybacks. It sounds simple, but behind it is the use of market dynamics to maximize the efficiency of this fund. In other words, they don't mechanically buy at a fixed price but instead flexibly act based on market conditions, buy back tokens, and reduce circulating supply simultaneously.
Most importantly, this operation has already executed the initial buyback through the reserve wallet, and the entire process is on-chain verifiable—such transparency is a plus in tokenomics. No need to rely on "our word is final"; the data is on the chain, and participants can verify it themselves.
From a buyback perspective, this is a way for the project team to manage inflation pressure and supply. Whether it can truly enhance the token's value depends on subsequent execution and market response.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiDoctor
· 6h ago
The consultation records show that this 20-40% buyback plan sounds like a targeted treatment for supply management, but the problem is—where are the hidden risks in the protocol code? On-chain verifiability doesn't mean the mechanism itself is free of vulnerabilities.
We need to wait a bit longer to see clinical performance; the key is whether the actual conversion rate of this buyback fee is effective, and whether liquidity indicators can truly improve. There are too many overly optimistic narratives.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 6h ago
20-40% buyback quota, sounds quite knowledgeable about economics, but I'm just worried it might be just on paper again.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 6h ago
It's another buyback and on-chain transparency... sounds good, but whether it can really boost the market depends on the coin price cooperation.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 6h ago
On-chain verifiability is indeed a good point, but the problem is that no matter how much buyback is done, it can't save a project that no one uses.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 6h ago
Another buyback and mechanism, politely called coin burning, but can it actually boost the market?
Recently, there was a quite interesting case—Aster announced the activation of its strategic buyback reserve and the launch of an automatic buyback mechanism. This is based on their Phase 5 buyback plan announced last month.
The core logic is straightforward: 20-40% of the platform's daily generated fees are used for targeted ASTER token buybacks. It sounds simple, but behind it is the use of market dynamics to maximize the efficiency of this fund. In other words, they don't mechanically buy at a fixed price but instead flexibly act based on market conditions, buy back tokens, and reduce circulating supply simultaneously.
Most importantly, this operation has already executed the initial buyback through the reserve wallet, and the entire process is on-chain verifiable—such transparency is a plus in tokenomics. No need to rely on "our word is final"; the data is on the chain, and participants can verify it themselves.
From a buyback perspective, this is a way for the project team to manage inflation pressure and supply. Whether it can truly enhance the token's value depends on subsequent execution and market response.