The day before yesterday, I was complaining to a friend in traditional finance, and he threw out a sentence: "RWA on the chain has been talked about for over a year, but truly privacy-preserving and compliant projects are scarce." That really struck a chord with me.
After some thought, the Dusk project is indeed quite interesting. Since 2018, they have been focusing on one thing: building a dedicated Layer 1 for the financial market, allowing real assets like stocks and bonds to be securely on-chain, while also protecting privacy and passing regulatory audits. It sounds simple, but actually doing it is difficult.
Recently, there has been progress. On January 7th, DuskEVM mainnet went live last year. What does this mean? Solidity developers no longer have to struggle so much; they can relatively smoothly build DeFi and RWA applications on it. Coupled with the privacy tool Hedger entering testing, the outline of the ecosystem is gradually becoming clearer.
But what really catches the eye is the collaboration with a regulated Dutch exchange. To put it plainly, they are advancing compliant tokenized securities trading. This "privacy plus compliance" dual insurance scheme is quite rare in the wave of RWA. Most projects tend to focus on either privacy or compliance, but few can do both well.
The road to RWA is still long, but this approach is worth continuous observation. Perhaps in the near future, on-chain finance will present a different face.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoSurvivor
· 3h ago
Privacy + compliance go hand in hand; this is the correct way to approach RWA. The reason most projects go off track is also related to this, and Dusk's logic is indeed worth exploring.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 3h ago
wait... "privacy + compliance" in one box? that's either genius or the biggest honeypot i haven't audited yet. DYOR on that dutch exchange partnership first — regulatory approval ≠ contract security, and i've seen too many "compliant" projects get absolutely wrecked by a single exploit vector nobody caught.
Reply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 3h ago
Privacy + compliance is indeed a rare combination, but the question is whether the ecosystem can truly keep up. It feels like Dusk has been making this move for so long...
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 3h ago
Wait, can privacy and compliance really be achieved at the same time? I always feel like there's a deadlock on the technical side...
From the candlestick chart, can RWA's current market trend break out?
Honestly, after working on this type of project for so many years, most of them end up as vapor, but Dusk's approach is indeed a bit different, worth observing and catching the bottom.
Two years ago, I thought the same, then... forget it, I don't want to revisit failures.
Regulatory audits sound comfortable, but how many actually pass?
If it really succeeds, I would be grateful, but now, would I still dare to get in?
Privacy and compliance are indeed scarce, but could it be because these two are inherently contradictory?
Wait for the testnet data to come out before making a decision; those who jump in now are all martyrs.
Look at the technical indicators; don't just focus on the vision, you need to see if it can really survive.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictim
· 3h ago
Bro, privacy and compliance are really a false proposition, right? To put it nicely, it's double insurance; to put it bluntly, it's trying to please both sides, and in the end, no one benefits.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 3h ago
Privacy and compliance are really hard to balance... Dusk's approach is indeed different; they've been focusing on this since 2018, which makes them much more reliable than most projects.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 3h ago
Privacy and compliance are really hard to balance... but Dusk's approach is a bit different, and the collaboration in the Netherlands is indeed quite innovative.
The day before yesterday, I was complaining to a friend in traditional finance, and he threw out a sentence: "RWA on the chain has been talked about for over a year, but truly privacy-preserving and compliant projects are scarce." That really struck a chord with me.
After some thought, the Dusk project is indeed quite interesting. Since 2018, they have been focusing on one thing: building a dedicated Layer 1 for the financial market, allowing real assets like stocks and bonds to be securely on-chain, while also protecting privacy and passing regulatory audits. It sounds simple, but actually doing it is difficult.
Recently, there has been progress. On January 7th, DuskEVM mainnet went live last year. What does this mean? Solidity developers no longer have to struggle so much; they can relatively smoothly build DeFi and RWA applications on it. Coupled with the privacy tool Hedger entering testing, the outline of the ecosystem is gradually becoming clearer.
But what really catches the eye is the collaboration with a regulated Dutch exchange. To put it plainly, they are advancing compliant tokenized securities trading. This "privacy plus compliance" dual insurance scheme is quite rare in the wave of RWA. Most projects tend to focus on either privacy or compliance, but few can do both well.
The road to RWA is still long, but this approach is worth continuous observation. Perhaps in the near future, on-chain finance will present a different face.