Some ICO projects employ questionable tactics worth examining closely. Recent observations include timing chain announcements like HyperEVM launches primarily for visibility, then inflating testnet activity metrics to build momentum ahead of fundraising rounds. The structure often involves angel allocations priced significantly below public raise levels—funds that conveniently align with disclosed and undisclosed influencer compensation packages. These patterns highlight why doing due diligence on project tokenomics, round sequencing, and KOL incentive transparency matters. Community members should scrutinize whether marketing hype reflects genuine utility or financial engineering designed to benefit early backers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugman_Walking
· 01-21 19:59
I'm too familiar with this trick—it's the angel round price again, and the KOL behind-the-scenes manipulation. It's all about exploiting information asymmetry.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 01-21 09:25
NGL, I'm too familiar with this routine. Watching these projects pump and dump every day... The testnet data is really inflated, and people believe any numbers just by exaggerating them.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 01-19 00:00
It's the same old trick again, constantly harvesting the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 01-18 23:59
How long can this routine last? Eventually, it will break down.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-18 23:57
NGL, this tactic is too old. The angel round to harvest profits is really a dead end. Promoting KOLs while hyping testnet data—wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 01-18 23:53
Yet another old trick of cutting leeks. I've seen through the testnet data manipulation long ago. The technical chart shows a head and shoulders top pattern.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-18 23:31
Same old tricks again: testnet data inflation, angel round discount prices, KOL behind-the-scenes manipulation—it's all been played out.
Some ICO projects employ questionable tactics worth examining closely. Recent observations include timing chain announcements like HyperEVM launches primarily for visibility, then inflating testnet activity metrics to build momentum ahead of fundraising rounds. The structure often involves angel allocations priced significantly below public raise levels—funds that conveniently align with disclosed and undisclosed influencer compensation packages. These patterns highlight why doing due diligence on project tokenomics, round sequencing, and KOL incentive transparency matters. Community members should scrutinize whether marketing hype reflects genuine utility or financial engineering designed to benefit early backers.