2026-01-18 22:42:34

Analysis of the main validator delegations in $ATOM

The Cosmos network continues to show an interesting distribution of stake among its validators. The top delegation chart reveals how validation power is distributed in the network, a key aspect for understanding the health and decentralization of ATOM.

This information is especially relevant for those participating in staking or monitoring the evolution of the Cosmos ecosystem. Validator concentration is an important indicator of the level of decentralization of the network and its ability to maintain blockchain security.

Tracking these metrics helps identify trends in validator participation and the trust that ATOM holders place in different nodes of the network.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoResearcher

· 6h ago

According to the Tokenomics model in the white paper, the validator distribution data of ATOM actually exposes a critical incentive misalignment issue—early large holders' delegation weights far exceed reasonable ranges, which in a highly decentralized market environment inevitably leads to a 51% attack risk. It is worth noting that the voting mechanism of Cosmos governance proposals has once again been confirmed as flawed. Specifically, it lacks sufficient decentralization checks and balances. I strongly recommend everyone read Section 3.2.1 of the IBC protocol, and you'll understand why this kind of distributed validation is doomed to fail from a game theory perspective. From on-chain data, the rising trend of delegation concentration perfectly illustrates what is called the "ultimate dilemma of token democracy"—seemingly decentralized, but actually more oligarchic than traditional finance. Why isn't this being discussed? In fact, someone has long mentioned on forums that Cosmos's DAO governance framework is powerless in dealing with validator power concentration. The design flaws of multi-signature contracts have re-emerged. How come everyone seems to have ignored this...

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 6h ago

The distribution of staking for this wave of ATOM looks okay, but it still seems that the concentration of top validators is a bit high.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971