When making money, you think your analysis is flawless
Having no issues with analysis doesn't mean your account is making money
Are you really after perfect logic, or real cash?
In trading, these are actually two different things. Some people have impeccable arguments but still lose money in trading. Others have rough methodologies but seize key opportunities. The market doesn't reward you for correct logic; it only rewards those who actually make money.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 8h ago
Damn, you're not wrong. I'm the kind of person with perfect logic but a completely red account...
What's the use of strong analytical skills? In the end, you're still beaten down by the market.
Alright, I admit defeat. Next time, I'll think less and do more.
This is my trading story, textbook-style losses.
No matter how beautiful the argument, it can't make up for the embarrassment of a stop-loss order.
That hurts. Feels like you're talking about me.
Better to make money first than to be perfect, really.
I just want to know how those rough methods managed to make money.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 8h ago
Really, I’ve seen too many self-righteous analysts, and in the end, they all lose everything in their accounts haha
---
Sometimes overanalyzing is just asking for trouble; the market simply doesn’t care how tight your logic is
---
That’s why I gave up on the idea of a perfect trading system long ago; making money is the real truth
---
A perfect argument ≠ an account turning green, brother, that’s a real punch to the gut
---
Honestly, execution and luck are often more valuable than your analytical framework
---
I’ve seen many trade plans that look like academic papers, but they all die at the first retracement
---
The most profitable person I know has average analysis skills; they just had the guts to seize a few big opportunities
---
Oh, overanalyzing yourself is really the biggest self-deception; the account is the true mirror
---
The market doesn’t give special treatment to those with correct logic; it only rewards those who make money
---
I used to pursue perfect analysis too, but later I realized I took too many detours; looking at the results is much faster
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTom
· 8h ago
Damn, this is a reflection of my past few months... The analysis was correct, but I still lost money. Truly incredible.
---
You're right, but knowing it and changing it are two different things. It's still too difficult to make the change.
---
So how exactly can we go from "perfect logic" to "actually making money"?
---
That hits close to home. I'm the kind of person who has a pretty argument but struggles to look good.
---
The market doesn't listen to your reasoning; it only looks at your profit and loss statement. It's brutal.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 8h ago
To be honest, this is what I’ve realized over the past two years. Just thinking things through isn’t enough; the account net value is the only true measure.
---
No matter how brilliant the analysis, it’s all useless. In the end, it still comes down to the return rate.
---
Got it, I just saw a point that woke me up. The logic behind my losing trades isn’t actually a problem...
---
Damn, this is the most heartbreaking part. I knew it all along but just couldn’t do it.
---
Perfectly proving that losing money can be justified, while rough strategies can make money—trading markets are so magical.
---
Honestly, a bunch of elite analysts lose money year after year, while some intuitive traders actually make steady profits.
---
So right now, I only care whether I’m making money or not. I’ll put other arguments aside for now.
---
Really, the market has always only rewarded those who make money. Those trades with perfect logic but losses are just self-deception.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 8h ago
Really, I've seen too many cases of people who think they've analyzed everything perfectly ending up liquidated.
Honestly, the market is just realism. No matter how beautifully you write your thesis, if you can't make money, it's useless.
I actually think some people can make money by blindly guessing based on intuition, which is much smarter than those who write long articles every day.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 8h ago
Only when losing do you realize that even perfect logic is useless
Making money is the hard truth, everything else is nonsense
This is the lesson the market has taught me
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 8h ago
That’s pretty harsh. I’m the kind of fool who ends up losing everything despite perfect reasoning.
No matter how beautiful the logic is, it’s useless. Zeroing out your account is the real solution.
Really, this is the biggest regret of my trading career.
No matter how much analysis I do, if I don’t catch the limit-up, it’s all for nothing.
The market doesn’t care about your ideas; it only cares whether you make money or not.
That hit me hard. I feel targeted.
Roughly making money versus sophisticated losing money—I’d rather choose the former.
When making money, you think your analysis is flawless
Having no issues with analysis doesn't mean your account is making money
Are you really after perfect logic, or real cash?
In trading, these are actually two different things. Some people have impeccable arguments but still lose money in trading. Others have rough methodologies but seize key opportunities. The market doesn't reward you for correct logic; it only rewards those who actually make money.