2026-01-18 21:23:31

Recently paying attention to the Plasma project, and it's quite interesting. What initially attracted me was actually its price performance—not a pure emotional surge, but showing clear range oscillation characteristics.

Some time ago, when the market was weakening, I took a closer look and found that the problem wasn't with the project itself, but rather with the overall market sentiment shrinking. It's easy to be confused in such times, but if you shift your perspective to the technical side, you can see clearly: we are currently in a phase of repeated turnover, and the chips are not out of control; instead, it indicates that there are still people seriously engaging in strategic play.

Compared to those coins that are continuously trending upward in a single direction, this is actually more worth watching, at least it proves that participation is still ongoing. Of course, I won't blindly be bullish because the market could shift at any time. But if the subsequent volume and structure can gradually recover, the health of Plasma's trend should be much stronger than many pure concept projects.

My strategy is very simple—don't chase, don't gamble, just wait for actual progress.

XPL-8,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 5h ago

The turnover phase is indeed more interesting than a one-sided rally, indicating that smart money is still lurking. As long as the chips are under control, there's hope; I'm just worried about those trash projects that get a big bullish candle with no one to buy. In a weak market, focus on the project's fundamentals—that's the dividing line between newcomers and veterans. Not chasing and not gambling is the right attitude; too many people lose by chasing highs and gambling a bit. Restoring trading volume is the key; it's still too early to say anything now.

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 5h ago

When there are buyers during the turnaround phase, it's a good sign, much more reliable than coins that are pushed in one direction. --- The range-bound movement of Plasma indeed looks comfortable; as long as the chips aren't乱, it means it's still alive. --- Market sentiment contraction is the ultimate test of vision; this guy's analysis is on point. --- Not chasing or gambling is the way to go. That's how I do it too. Those who rush in end up losing. --- Restoring volume structure is the key; just looking at the price is gambling. --- Honestly, coins that rise unilaterally are even more dangerous. I trust the slow grind like Plasma more. --- As long as the chips aren't out of control, there's still a chance. I agree with this logic. --- Wait for actual progress, no hype, no blackening. This is the attitude investors should have.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 5h ago

Range fluctuation indicates that some people are still playing, and I agree with that. However, whether Plasma can truly be repaired depends on the actual progress moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 5h ago

Volatility and consolidation are actually the biggest tests of human nature. Your analysis is quite calm, but I need to observe Plasma a bit more. As long as the chips haven't dispersed, it's worth paying attention, but don't be fooled by the turnover; many times that's just the market maker switching hands. I agree with your logic. Compared to projects that hit the daily limit up in one go, this kind of solid consolidation is actually healthier. Wait, when you say volume recovery, what specific indicator do you mean? Or are you just looking at trading volume? I have a similar idea—don't chase or gamble, that's the way to go. The market is full of scripts that cut the leeks. Any recent progress with Plasma? The technicals look good, but ultimately, fundamentals still matter.

View OriginalReply0