Can this observation be confirmed: mainstream AI labs generally offer heavily subsidized usage packages. When running batch projects via API, the billing can quickly skyrocket. However, even so, this cost is still ridiculously cheap compared to any real human labor, and the speed is also ridiculously fast. For Web3 developers, this is something worth pondering.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LoneValidatorvip
· 2h ago
Even if AI costs become cheaper, it still requires spending money. Does Web3 have a chance then?
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapistvip
· 3h ago
Calculating it, AI costs are still cost-effective, but the current subsidies are so aggressive that it's a bit suspicious.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 3h ago
The AI subsidy thing will end sooner or later, and only then can we see who truly has competitiveness.
View OriginalReply0
ETHmaxi_NoFiltervip
· 3h ago
AI computing power is so cheap, but Web3 is still riding the trend... It's a bit out of sync with the rhythm.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalystvip
· 3h ago
Subsidies are essentially about burning money to cultivate user habits. Once you become indispensable, it's time to raise prices. Web3 really needs to think about how to make use of this window of opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)