In the world of crypto finance, two different paths are evolving simultaneously.
One is the traditional internet giants' top-down approach—restructuring the financial system through platform aggregation and licensing strategies. The other appears more pragmatic, originating from within the DeFi ecosystem, building bridges to the market step by step through lending protocols and yield layers.
Recently, many DeFi projects have been attempting a common goal: redefining the cost and return of capital. Take a lending protocol deeply rooted on the BNB Chain as an example; its latest developments are worth noting. The protocol has made two very tangible improvements.
**The first step is interest rate reduction.** The annualized interest rates for some lending products have been pushed below 3%, which is quite rare in the current market. For users needing liquidity or seeking leverage, this means access to cheaper funding tools.
**The second step is the introduction of yields from real-world assets.** For example, U.S. Treasury yields range approximately between 3.6% and 4.7%, providing a relatively stable reference for crypto assets. In other words, you can achieve near-traditional financial risk hedging within DeFi.
Combining these two features creates interesting possibilities. Users can stake assets like BNB to lend out low-interest stablecoins, then capture other higher-yield opportunities—forming a "leverage cycle." Alternatively, some funds can be allocated into RWA pools to balance risk and return.
From an incentive perspective, locking governance tokens can yield nearly 39% annual rewards, which is attractive for those looking to participate long-term in community building. All of this is executed automatically via smart contracts, ensuring transparency and composability.
According to the roadmap, such protocols are planning to cross-chain to Ethereum and expand the scope of RWA assets. This indicates an evolution from single-chain lending protocols to a multi-chain yield infrastructure. This growth approach is entirely different from traditional M&A logic; it is an organic network effect based on open-source protocols and community consensus.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropBlackHole
· 4h ago
3% interest rate? Uh, that's a bit too idealistic. Where's the catch then?
Really treating RWA as a safe asset... I advise you to think it through.
How long is the 39% reward lock-up period? Don't tell me it's another nested incentive.
I played with BNB borrowing stablecoins back in 2021, and I ended up losing a lot.
Cross-chain Ethereum sounds good, but I still don't know if a single-chain mode can run smoothly.
This so-called "organic growth" sounds nice, but it's just about the token price.
Leverage cycling sounds a bit dangerous...
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 4h ago
A 3% lending rate is really amazing; this is what DeFi should be doing
---
Wait, 39% governance token rewards? Is this number a bit too high?
---
RWA integration into DeFi is indeed a major trend, much more reliable than those vapor projects
---
Cross-chain Ethereum? Okay, I’ll wait and see if it can really be implemented
---
I get the logic of leverage cycling, but how is the risk control?
---
Compared to those top internet companies' top-down approach, this kind of organic growth feels more like Web3
---
The composability aspect is awesome; this is the essence of DeFi
---
I need low-interest stablecoins; I’ll jump on and try it out
---
Benchmarking US Treasury yields, finally some risk reference point
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 4h ago
The 3% lending rate really confused me; is this going to disrupt the entire lending market rhythm?
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 4h ago
3% lending rate? Now the big players should be worried
---
RWA+ leverage cycle, in simple terms, is bringing traditional finance practices into crypto, but the transparency is definitely different
---
39% governance token rewards sound appealing, but how sustainable are these incentives? It always feels like newcomers will get exploited later
---
Multi-chain expansion sounds good, but can it truly ensure cross-chain security? Or is it just another potential scam waiting to happen
---
I'm a bit curious, how long can this "organic network effect" last?
---
Low-interest stablecoins really hit the demand, finally reminding everyone that there are still liquidity-hungry users out there
In the world of crypto finance, two different paths are evolving simultaneously.
One is the traditional internet giants' top-down approach—restructuring the financial system through platform aggregation and licensing strategies. The other appears more pragmatic, originating from within the DeFi ecosystem, building bridges to the market step by step through lending protocols and yield layers.
Recently, many DeFi projects have been attempting a common goal: redefining the cost and return of capital. Take a lending protocol deeply rooted on the BNB Chain as an example; its latest developments are worth noting. The protocol has made two very tangible improvements.
**The first step is interest rate reduction.** The annualized interest rates for some lending products have been pushed below 3%, which is quite rare in the current market. For users needing liquidity or seeking leverage, this means access to cheaper funding tools.
**The second step is the introduction of yields from real-world assets.** For example, U.S. Treasury yields range approximately between 3.6% and 4.7%, providing a relatively stable reference for crypto assets. In other words, you can achieve near-traditional financial risk hedging within DeFi.
Combining these two features creates interesting possibilities. Users can stake assets like BNB to lend out low-interest stablecoins, then capture other higher-yield opportunities—forming a "leverage cycle." Alternatively, some funds can be allocated into RWA pools to balance risk and return.
From an incentive perspective, locking governance tokens can yield nearly 39% annual rewards, which is attractive for those looking to participate long-term in community building. All of this is executed automatically via smart contracts, ensuring transparency and composability.
According to the roadmap, such protocols are planning to cross-chain to Ethereum and expand the scope of RWA assets. This indicates an evolution from single-chain lending protocols to a multi-chain yield infrastructure. This growth approach is entirely different from traditional M&A logic; it is an organic network effect based on open-source protocols and community consensus.