The 100 Pulses scaling approach is definitely interesting. I'm curious about the technical implementation though—how exactly does the team plan to handle throughput bottlenecks as the network grows? What's the infrastructure strategy behind achieving that scale? The mechanics of this would be crucial to understand before evaluating whether the network can genuinely sustain it long-term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SighingCashier
· 14h ago
100 Pulses sounds good, but can it really handle the throughput? Feels like the same old trick.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 14h ago
The explanation of the throughput bottleneck is good; the key still depends on how they implement sharding. Otherwise, even with a high TPS, it's all just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 14h ago
The consultation records show that this project only makes promises and all the architectural details are black boxes. The question about throughput bottlenecks is well-phrased, but I find the team's response quite vague—this is just clinical manifestation. It is recommended to regularly review their code audit reports.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 15h ago
Throughput is indeed the key, but to be honest, the team hasn't provided a very clear roadmap over the years.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 15h ago
Throughput is really a bottleneck; having ideas alone isn't enough. It also depends on whether the infrastructure can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 15h ago
Throughput is really a major weakness; many projects have failed here... Can the team pull it off this time?
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 15h ago
Honestly, 100 Pulses sounds good, but I've seen these number games many times... The key still depends on whether the infrastructure can keep up.
The 100 Pulses scaling approach is definitely interesting. I'm curious about the technical implementation though—how exactly does the team plan to handle throughput bottlenecks as the network grows? What's the infrastructure strategy behind achieving that scale? The mechanics of this would be crucial to understand before evaluating whether the network can genuinely sustain it long-term.