From a technical bottom-up perspective, the core essence of an Agent is essentially a set of if-else logic, context switching, and thread switching. What does this imply?
Digging deeper, the entire AI narrative is quietly shifting its focus back to one place—CPU.
Why is that? Because these seemingly intelligent Agents, no matter how optimized, ultimately rely on chip computing power to execute. Context switching requires rapid CPU scheduling, and thread parallelism depends on multi-core architectures. These are not issues that GPT can solve.
Looking at it this way, the key players in the chip industry—AMD, Intel, and ARM—actually become the real beneficiaries. Whether their CPU architectures can efficiently handle complex parallel computations and frequent context switches directly determines the practical implementation efficiency of the Agent ecosystem.
Interestingly, the market still hasn't fully realized this layer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaLeaker
· 4h ago
Wow, this angle is quite something; it feels like it hits the dead end of AI storytelling. But speaking of which, the ultimate beneficiaries are still those chip giants? This logical chain feels a bit too smooth...
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 4h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. After all the GPU hype, it still ultimately comes down to the CPU for the livelihood.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 4h ago
After all that, it still comes back to the CPU. To put it simply, large models are just a shell.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 4h ago
Wow, this perspective is fresh. I always thought the story of Agent would end with large models, but it turns out the real winner is still in chips? CPU is actually the final boss—didn't see that coming.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 4h ago
Damn, this logic—CPU is the ultimate winner, is the GPU going to lose this round?
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 4h ago
Wow, this angle is fresh. I've been hearing people praise GPT as amazing, but in the end, it still relies on CPU fallback? It seems like chip giants should be secretly celebrating.
From a technical bottom-up perspective, the core essence of an Agent is essentially a set of if-else logic, context switching, and thread switching. What does this imply?
Digging deeper, the entire AI narrative is quietly shifting its focus back to one place—CPU.
Why is that? Because these seemingly intelligent Agents, no matter how optimized, ultimately rely on chip computing power to execute. Context switching requires rapid CPU scheduling, and thread parallelism depends on multi-core architectures. These are not issues that GPT can solve.
Looking at it this way, the key players in the chip industry—AMD, Intel, and ARM—actually become the real beneficiaries. Whether their CPU architectures can efficiently handle complex parallel computations and frequent context switches directly determines the practical implementation efficiency of the Agent ecosystem.
Interestingly, the market still hasn't fully realized this layer.