Everyone's chasing speed, but nobody's asking the right question—at what cost?
Slow blockchains actually hit different. While everyone hypes high-TPS chains as the next big thing, they're basically just larping as Layer 2 solutions. Same scalability tricks, different marketing.
Here's the thing: real money doesn't chase speed. Watch where actual wealth flows—it gravitates toward security and decentralization, not processing power. The slow lane is where sovereignty lives.
The obsession with TPS is quietly killing what made blockchain worth building in the first place. Every optimization for velocity is a tradeoff in independence. You gain throughput, you lose control. You gain scalability, you lose the whole point.
Consensus doesn't scale linearly. Sovereignty isn't a feature you can just patch in later. When you design for speed first, you're already choosing whose interests come second.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 4h ago
Nah fr, that's why I still only trust BTC and ETH. Those projects that hype up TPS are basically just selling dreams. Real money has long seen through it.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 4h ago
ngl this guy is spot on, TPS fans really need to wake up
---
The faster the speed, the quicker sovereignty dies. This logic is absolute
---
But it’s true... a bunch of people are hyping TPS, while the real money has long moved to Bitcoin and Ethereum
---
"Gain throughput but lose control"—this sentence hit me hard, no doubt
---
So those chains claiming to be thousands of times faster than BTC are actually just selling an illusion
---
What are Solana and others rushing for? In the end, they’ll have to go back and learn Ethereum’s modular approach
---
Sounds like a critique of those high TPS chains... the words are tough, but there’s some truth to it
---
Sovereignty is actually severely underestimated; everyone is chasing speed and forgetting that security itself is valuable
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 4h ago
ngl, this guy is quite right. The TPS arms race is just a smokescreen. The real big players have long seen through it and are still stacking BTC.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 4h ago
ngl, this is the real talk. Speed believers are still hyping up TPS, not knowing they've already been trapped in it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 4h ago
NGL, this point really hit me... Truly big players are indeed focusing on building security and decentralization, not just caring about that TPS number.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 4h ago
To be honest, I agree with this view only halfway. Speed is indeed not everything, but exaggerating the slow chain as a savior is a bit much. The key is to see what you want—do you really care about decentralization or just want to quickly arbitrage? Most people talk about sovereignty, but their wallets are still filled with high-TPS trash.
Everyone's chasing speed, but nobody's asking the right question—at what cost?
Slow blockchains actually hit different. While everyone hypes high-TPS chains as the next big thing, they're basically just larping as Layer 2 solutions. Same scalability tricks, different marketing.
Here's the thing: real money doesn't chase speed. Watch where actual wealth flows—it gravitates toward security and decentralization, not processing power. The slow lane is where sovereignty lives.
The obsession with TPS is quietly killing what made blockchain worth building in the first place. Every optimization for velocity is a tradeoff in independence. You gain throughput, you lose control. You gain scalability, you lose the whole point.
Consensus doesn't scale linearly. Sovereignty isn't a feature you can just patch in later. When you design for speed first, you're already choosing whose interests come second.