Cosmos played a crucial role in launching multiple blockchains, including BNB Chain, which went on to achieve massive adoption and market dominance. Ironically, while these projects soared, Cosmos itself struggled to capture comparable momentum. This raises a compelling question about incentive alignment in blockchain ecosystems—does building infrastructure for others inevitably mean missing out on your own upside? Or is there a model where ecosystem creators and participants can both win? The answer might reshape how we think about protocol strategy and token economics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredWatcher
· 9h ago
That's why I say Cosmos is a bit silly... enriching BNB but not benefiting oneself, typical of a good-hearted person getting the short end of the stick.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 10h ago
Honestly, Cosmos this time is a bit awkward; setting the stage and performing, but ending up as a supporting role instead.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 11h ago
Having a child but being surpassed by a stepchild, this is the fate of Cosmos, I should have seen this game rule clearly earlier.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 12h ago
This is a typical case of "making a wedding dress for others." Cosmos sets the stage for BNB to perform a grand show, but in the end, it becomes just a tool... Truly ironic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 12h ago
Nah, this is the paradox of Web3—paving the way for others, but ending up falling behind oneself.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 13h ago
This thing with Cosmos is indeed ironic; supporting others to reach the sky while falling behind oneself.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTrader
· 13h ago
nah this is the classic infrastructure trap nobody talks about... cosmos literally built the highway but forgot to own the toll booths lol
Reply0
NFTPessimist
· 13h ago
That's why I always say the infrastructure side can never benefit from the road they build themselves. LOL
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 13h ago
This thing with Cosmos is indeed ironic; paving the way for others, but ending up falling behind oneself.
Cosmos played a crucial role in launching multiple blockchains, including BNB Chain, which went on to achieve massive adoption and market dominance. Ironically, while these projects soared, Cosmos itself struggled to capture comparable momentum. This raises a compelling question about incentive alignment in blockchain ecosystems—does building infrastructure for others inevitably mean missing out on your own upside? Or is there a model where ecosystem creators and participants can both win? The answer might reshape how we think about protocol strategy and token economics.