You rarely see a founder this detached from their own project's future. Teams and tokens in the ecosystem keep reaching out, hoping for some acknowledgment or backing—a retweet, a mention, anything. But the response is basically crickets, maybe a like if you're lucky.
Compare that to other builders who actively champion their communities, push their projects forward, engage with ecosystem partners. The contrast is stark. Beyond capital injection, there's minimal hands-on leadership or vision-setting happening. It raises real questions about founder commitment and what that signals to token holders and teams banking on the project's success.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusDissenter
· 8h ago
This founder is really terrible, the community is shouting until they are hoarse but he doesn't respond at all
---
Indifferent to an absurd degree, it feels like he doesn't care whether this project lives or dies
---
Just lying flat, no wonder token holders are fleeing
---
Compared to other builders, it immediately shows how disappointing he is. Once the money is burned, there's no story left
---
Not even giving any interaction, truly not considering the ecosystem at all
---
To put it simply, he takes the money and disappears. I’ve even forgotten how they raised funds back then
---
Such founders really shame Web3, the community deserves to cut losses
---
Won't even build an ecosystem, and still expects someone to be optimistic about this broken project
---
How are people still holding? I would have already dumped it
---
The feeling of taking the money and running, where is the leadership? It’s all just empty talk
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 8h ago
This founder status is really outrageous, where are the people?
---
That's how the crypto world is—after raising money, they disappear without even a single interaction.
---
They sell tokens and then vanish into thin air. Who dares to compete with that?
---
Laughing to death, do they want other builders to be worse? This is the ceiling.
---
Ecosystem partners are waiting here, but the big brother is probably just scrolling through TikTok.
---
I've seen many founders like this, taking the money and running.
---
Speechless... They can't even spare a retweet, let alone talk about vision.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 8h ago
This founder is really giving up. They don't even provide any interaction, and people in the ecosystem are almost going crazy with frustration.
You rarely see a founder this detached from their own project's future. Teams and tokens in the ecosystem keep reaching out, hoping for some acknowledgment or backing—a retweet, a mention, anything. But the response is basically crickets, maybe a like if you're lucky.
Compare that to other builders who actively champion their communities, push their projects forward, engage with ecosystem partners. The contrast is stark. Beyond capital injection, there's minimal hands-on leadership or vision-setting happening. It raises real questions about founder commitment and what that signals to token holders and teams banking on the project's success.