Looking at the current state of this industry is quite interesting——Traditional finance requires everything to be on the table, subject to audits, nothing can be hidden; on the other hand, blockchain aims for complete anonymity, where nothing is visible to others. Putting these two logics together, institutional investors are caught in the middle, wanting to enjoy the benefits of innovation but also fearing regulatory crackdowns.
Dusk’s approach is actually quite clever; they aim to solve this deadlock—how to make privacy and compliance coexist.
In fact, privacy is not about hiding everything, but about learning to choose. Traditional privacy coins, for example, make transaction information a black box for everyone, which indeed prevents outsiders from seeing details, but regulators can’t perform KYC and AML checks, so this approach simply doesn’t pass muster. Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs, which are different; the core logic is: I can prove I meet your requirements without revealing who I am or my specific details.
For example, a user might want to prove they have $1 million in compliant assets without revealing the exact composition of that money; or an individual investor wants to access a DeFi protocol, just needing to prove they are in an allowed region, without revealing all their identity information. The benefit of this approach is a win-win—user privacy is protected, and regulators can still perform the necessary checks.
Ultimately, trust is the foundation of finance. Compliance isn’t meant to be a bottleneck, but to ensure all parties can operate with confidence. Dusk’s design philosophy is to embed regulatory requirements from the very beginning, rather than patching them on later. This bottom-up approach to considering compliance may actually be more sustainable than the convoluted methods used before.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerHopper
· 1h ago
The idea of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed interesting, but how many projects can truly be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed clever; finally, someone has realized that privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive dead ends.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are really impressive; they can ensure privacy and pass audits without having to choose one over the other.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed a clever logic; privacy and compliance are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 4h ago
The logic of zero-knowledge proofs is truly brilliant; finally, someone has understood it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 5h ago
Haha, it's the old three tricks of privacy compliance again, talking up a storm but how many actually use it?
---
Zero-knowledge proofs sound awesome, but trust me, in the end, it still depends on who is truly committed to pushing it.
---
This logic sounds like patching oneself up; essentially, it's still about compromise.
---
So Dusk is playing that "both" game—let's see how long they can hold on.
---
Strange, why can't any project truly break the deadlock?
---
Basically, it's about wanting both fish and bear paws, but reality is never that gentle.
---
I've heard quite a few times about the underlying compliance considerations, but the key still depends on implementation capability.
Looking at the current state of this industry is quite interesting——Traditional finance requires everything to be on the table, subject to audits, nothing can be hidden; on the other hand, blockchain aims for complete anonymity, where nothing is visible to others. Putting these two logics together, institutional investors are caught in the middle, wanting to enjoy the benefits of innovation but also fearing regulatory crackdowns.
Dusk’s approach is actually quite clever; they aim to solve this deadlock—how to make privacy and compliance coexist.
In fact, privacy is not about hiding everything, but about learning to choose. Traditional privacy coins, for example, make transaction information a black box for everyone, which indeed prevents outsiders from seeing details, but regulators can’t perform KYC and AML checks, so this approach simply doesn’t pass muster. Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs, which are different; the core logic is: I can prove I meet your requirements without revealing who I am or my specific details.
For example, a user might want to prove they have $1 million in compliant assets without revealing the exact composition of that money; or an individual investor wants to access a DeFi protocol, just needing to prove they are in an allowed region, without revealing all their identity information. The benefit of this approach is a win-win—user privacy is protected, and regulators can still perform the necessary checks.
Ultimately, trust is the foundation of finance. Compliance isn’t meant to be a bottleneck, but to ensure all parties can operate with confidence. Dusk’s design philosophy is to embed regulatory requirements from the very beginning, rather than patching them on later. This bottom-up approach to considering compliance may actually be more sustainable than the convoluted methods used before.