2026-01-17 13:25:46

Honestly, there are indeed too many perpetual contract platforms nowadays. But on the other hand, the number of active trading users is relatively fixed, so each platform is competing for that small pool of traffic. In this situation, you can either choose the leading platforms to compete for capital and stability, or find those platforms with clear differentiated advantages.

The platforms I’ve been using recently are generally chosen based on the following criteria:

**Leading Derivatives Exchanges**: Deep liquidity, low slippage, suitable for large trades. The downside is that fees are not cheap, and the interface is often complex to accommodate all features.

**Professional Derivatives Trading Platforms**: More detailed trading tools, better risk management features. Highly active communities, suitable for traders with some experience. Fee structures are more flexible, and market maker discounts are quite substantial.

**Emerging Lightweight Platforms**: Simple interface, easy to get started, suitable for quick opening of positions. However, liquidity and capital scale are relatively small, and large trades may experience slippage.

My logic is: use different tools depending on the market environment and position size. In a bull market, platforms with good liquidity naturally attract more traffic; in a volatile or sideways market, those with fee discounts and comprehensive risk control tools become more attractive.

Rather than blindly following a particular platform, it’s better to understand each platform’s core competitive advantages and choose based on your trading habits. Only then can you find the one that best suits you among many options.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CrossChainBreather

· 6h ago

The fees on top-tier platforms are really incredible, using a risk control tool feels like cutting leeks Emerging platforms with large slippage will make you regret, it's better to switch between multiple platforms The interface is simple and clean, but if liquidity is poor, it's useless The key is to choose tools based on market temperament, don't be stupid and only rely on one platform Platforms with significant fee discounts and active communities are indeed pretty good Deep capital pools are truly satisfying, large transactions can be made without fear of getting stuck Honestly, just try using multiple accounts and you'll see, armchair strategies are useless

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 6h ago

That's right, I also use the arbitrage across multiple platforms. It all depends on who has the lowest fees and slippage. For large orders, you still need to go to top-tier exchanges; stability can't be compromised by taking risks. Emerging platforms do have a more user-friendly interface, but large transactions are really prone to being exploited. This guy's analysis is quite thorough, without blindly praising any one platform, with a clear train of thought. The tools used in a bull or bear market definitely need adjustment; liquidity is king, but fee priority also depends on the scenario. The key is to have several backup options on hand; don't put all your chips in one basket. It seems you have a pretty deep understanding of trading tools. Tell me more about the market maker discounts. Platforms with poor liquidity have experienced big slippage a few times; since then, I never underestimate this factor again.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 6h ago

You're right, you need to prepare more hands --- The top ones are indeed stable, but they are extremely expensive --- I’m also using this tactic in a volatile market, it can save a lot on fees --- Lightweight platforms are user-friendly for beginners, but a big order can easily run away --- The core is still to understand how each one makes money, don’t just blindly trust one --- Liquidity is the key, everything else is虚的 --- Differentiation is crucial, otherwise they would have been squeezed out by the top players long ago --- I just want to know when things will settle down, this competition is getting more intense --- Risk control tools are indeed much more important than fees --- Switching between multiple platforms is quite troublesome, but there’s no other way

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 6h ago

That's right, you need to switch between multiple accounts. I've been hit with slippage harvesting on the Equator five times. Fast order execution? I don't believe it; it makes me want to smash my computer. Flexible fees? I feel like it's still just cutting the leeks. Good liquidity? Give me a break, a big order drops straight into a waterfall. I respect this logic, but executing it is a bit tiring. Everyone has money during a bull market, retail investors are the real ones struggling. In volatile markets, risk control is indeed crucial; otherwise, you'll be repeatedly cut.

View OriginalReply0